Stuurman S. Herodotus and Sima Qian: History and the Anthropological Turn in Ancient Greece and Han China // Journal of World History. 2008. № 19. P. 1–40; Hardy G. Worlds of Bronze and Bamboo: Sima Qian’s Conquest of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.
29
Hartog F. Le Miroir d’Hérodote. Paris: Gallimard, 2001; Wang Q. E. The Chinese World View // Journal of World History. 1999. № 10. P. 285–305; Wang Q. E. World History in Traditional China // Storia della Storiografia. 1999. № 35. P. 83–96.
30
Dirlik A. Performing the World. P. 407.
31
См.: Iggers G., Wang Q. E. A Global History of Modern Historiography. New York: Pearson Longman, 2008; Woolf D. (ed.). The Oxford History of Historical Writing: In 5 vol. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011–2012.
32
Subrahmanyam S. On World Historians in the Sixteenth Century // Representations. 2005. № 91. P. 26–57.
33
Цит. по: Gruzinski S. What Time Is It There? America and Islam at the Dawn of Modern Times. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010. P. 73.
34
Subrahmanyam S. Op. cit. P. 37; Gruzinski S. Les quatre parties du monde: Histoire d’une mondialisation. Paris: Martinière, 2004.
35
Gruzinski S. What Time Is It There? P. 69.
36
Osterhammel J. Die Entzauberung Asiens: Europa und die asiatischen Reiche im 18. Jahrhundert. München: C. H. Beck, 1998. P. 271–348. См. также: Gunn G. C. First Globalization: The Eurasian Exchange 1500–1800. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. P. 145–168; Clarke J. J. Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter between Asian and Western Thought. London: Routledge, 1997.
37
Цит. по: van der Zande J. August Ludwig Schlözer and the English Universal History // Berger S., Lambert P., Schumann P. (eds.).. Historikerdialoge: Geschichte, Mythos und Gedächtnis im deutsch-britischen kulturellen Austausch, 1750–2000. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003. P. 135.
38
O’Brien K. Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. О Гиббоне см. также.: Pocock J. G. A. Barbarism and Religion: In 5 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999–2011. Автор использует общеупотребительный термин «турок», в то время как современная историография говорит об «османах», показывая несводимость Османской империи к турецкому этническому компоненту. – Прим. науч. ред.
39
Cм., например: Harbsmeier M. World Histories before Domestication: The Writing of Universal Histories, Histories of Mankind and World Histories in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany // Culture and History. 1989. № 5. P. 93–131. Об устойчивости библейской хронологии см.: Marchand S. L. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race, and Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
40
См., например: Duara P. Rescuing History from the Nation: Questioning Narratives of Modern China. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
41
Robinson J. L. Bartolomé Mitre Historian of the Americas. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1982; Burns E. B. Ideology in Nineteenth-Century Latin American Historiography // The Hispanic American Historical Review. 1978. № 58. P. 409–431.
42
См., например: Tanaka S. Japan’s Orient: Rendering Pasts into History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993; Lingelbach G. Klio macht Karriere: Die Institutionalisierung der Geschichtswissenschaft in Frankreich und den USA in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003.
43
Koselleck R. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press, 2004; Blix G. Charting the «Transitional Period»: The Emergence of Modern Time in the Nineteenth Century // History and Theory. 2006. № 45. P. 51–71. См. также: Berger S. Introduction: Towards a Global History of National Historiographies // Berger S. (ed.). Writing the Nation: A Global Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 1–29.
44
Burns S. Before the Nation: Kokugaku and the Imagining of Community in Early Modern Japan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
45
Elman B. A. From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
46
Sachsenmaier D. Global History, Pluralism, and the Question of Traditions // New Global Studies. 2009. № 3. Р. 3–4.
47
О глобальных исторических подходах см. в особенности: Sachsenmaier D. Global Perspectives on Global History: Theories and Approaches in a Connected World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. P. 11–17. См. также: Woolf D. A Global History of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
48
Hegel G. W. F. The Philosophy of History / Transl. J. Sibree, intr. C. J. Friedrich. New York: Dover Publications, 1956. P. 91; Duara P. Rescuing History from the Nation.
49
О традиционном подходе см.: O’Brien P. Historiographical Traditions and Modern Imperatives for the Restoration of Global History // Journal of Global History. 2006. № 1. P. 3–39.
50
Hill C. L. National History and the World of Nations.
51
Karl R. E. Creating Asia: China in the World at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century // American Historical Review. 1998. № 103. P. 1109.
52
Engels F., Marx K. The Communist Manifesto: A Modern Edition. London: Verso, 1998. P. 39 (Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест коммунистической партии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения: В 39 т. М.: Гос. изд-во