Karen L. Georgi

Critical Shift


Скачать книгу

      

      CRITICAL SHIFT

      CRITICAL

      SHIFT

      Rereading Jarves, Cook, Stillman,

      and the Narratives of

      Nineteenth-Century American Art

      Karen L. Georgi

      THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS

      UNIVERSITY PARK, PENNSYLVANIA

      A version of chapter 1 was previously published as Karen L. Georgi, “James Jackson Jarves’s Art Criticism: Aesthetic Classification and Historiographical Consequences,” Journal of American Studies 42, no. 2 (2008): 215–35. Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press.

      Reprinted with permission.

      Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

      Georgi, Karen, 1966–

      Critical shift : rereading Jarves, Cook, Stillman, and the narratives of nineteenth-century American art / Karen Georgi.

      p. cm.

      Summary: “A reassessment of the writings of the mid-nineteenth-century American art critics James Jackson Jarves (1818–1888), Clarence Cook (1828–1900), and William J. Stillman (1828–1901), and their role in the historiography of American art”—Provided by publisher.

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      ISBN 978-0-271-06066-8 (cloth : alk. paper)

      1. Art criticism—United States—History—19th century.

      2. Jarves, James Jackson, 1818–1888—Criticism and interpretation.

      3. Cook, Clarence, 1828–1900—Criticism and interpretation.

      4. Stillman, William James, 1828–1901—Criticism and interpretation.

      5. Art, American—Historiography.

      I. Title.

      N7485.U6G46 2013

      701'.180973—dc23

      2013003234

      Copyright © 2013 The Pennsylvania State University

      All rights reserved

      Printed in the United States of America

      Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press,

      University Park, PA 16802-1003

      The Pennsylvania State University Press is a member of the Association of American University Presses.

      It is the policy of The Pennsylvania State University Press to use acid-free paper. Publications on uncoated stock satisfy the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Material, ANSI Z39.48-1992.

      This book is printed on paper that contains 30% post-consumer waste.

       CONTENTS

       List of Illustrations

       Acknowledgments

       Introduction

       1 Rereading James Jackson Jarves’s Art-Idea

       2 Clarence Cook and Jarves: Fact, Feeling, and the Discourse of Truthfulness in Art

       3 A Further Look at Clarence Cook and the “Revolution” in Art

       4 William J. Stillman’s Ruskinian Criticism: Metaphor and Essential Meaning

       5 Art Discourse After Ruskin: Time and History in Art

       Notes

       Bibliography

       Index

       ILLUSTRATIONS

      1 Emanuel Leutze, Washington Crossing the Delaware, 1851

      2 Emanuel Leutze, The Storming of the Teocalli by Cortez and His Troops, 1848

      3 Thomas Charles Farrer, Mount Holyoke and the Connecticut River, 1865

      4 John La Farge, October, Hillside, Noonday, Glen Cove, Long Island, 1860

      5 Elihu Vedder, Questioner of the Sphinx, 1863

      6 John La Farge, Paradise Valley, 1866–68

      7 Elihu Vedder, Cumaean Sibyl, 1876

      8 Frederick A. Bridgman, Funeral of a Mummy, 1876–77

       ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

      I wish to acknowledge most gratefully Berklee College of Music for a yearlong leave of absence in which to concentrate on this book before my allotted sabbatical year arrived. In particular, I thank former department chair Charles Combs and former division dean Lawrence McClellan, who very kindly facilitated this leave, lending personal as well as institutional encouragement to the endeavor. In Rome, I owe many thanks to Cristina Giorcelli, director of the doctoral program in American studies at the Università degli Studi di Roma, Roma Tre; to Sara Antonelli, university researcher at Roma Tre; to John Cabot University for faculty development funds; and to the librarians of the Centro Studi Americani, particularly to Annalisa Capristo and Silvia Cellitti. In the latter stages of this project, Leo Mazow and Jochen Wierich attentively read and commented on the manuscript, giving me pertinent advice for improving it. I thank them for their participation and thoughtful readings. For the actual publication of the book, I am certainly indebted to Eleanor Goodman, executive editor at the Pennsylvania State University Press, who steered the manuscript (and its author) through the long process with a steady hand and much good will. My sincere thanks also to the wonderfully efficient, helpful, and friendly members of the editorial and production departments: Patty Mitchell, production coordinator; Jennifer Norton, assistant director and design and production manager; Charlee Redman, editorial assistant; Laura Reed-Morrisson, managing editor; and Julie Schoelles, manuscript editor. It is a pleasure to have the chance here to thank my teachers Alan Draper, the late Betsy Rezelman, Patricia Hills, and Eric Rosenberg, who, directly or indirectly, have been fundamental to my thinking on this and ever so many other topics. I am particularly grateful to Eric Rosenberg for his encouragement, mentoring, and friendship, not to mention his ongoing engagement with this book. And, finally, to four Georgis and one Puglisi, my deepest gratitude for their love and support.

       INTRODUCTION

      Everything in a picture, it must be added, depends on the composition; if it be the subject that makes the interest, it is the composition that makes, or that at any rate expresses, the subject. By that law, accordingly, our boxful of ghosts [the correspondence of W. W. Story] “compose,” hang together, consent to a mutual relation, confess, in fact, to a mutual dependence. If it is a question of living again, they can live but by each other’s help, so that they close in, join hands, press together for warmth and contact. The picture, before it can be denied, is therefore so made; the sitters are all in their places, and the group fills the frame. We see thereby what has operated, we both recognise, so to speak, the principle of composition and are enabled to name the subject. The subject is the period—it