on the Open management education goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
60. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
61. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
62. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
63. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
64. What is the scope?
<--- Score
65. What is in scope?
<--- Score
66. Is there a clear Open management education case definition?
<--- Score
67. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
68. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
69. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
70. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
71. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
72. Is there a Open management education management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
73. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
74. Are accountability and ownership for Open management education clearly defined?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
77. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
78. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
79. What are the Open management education use cases?
<--- Score
80. How do you catch Open management education definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
81. Have all basic functions of Open management education been defined?
<--- Score
82. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of Open management education?
<--- Score
84. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
85. What sources do you use to gather information for a Open management education study?
<--- Score
86. Will a Open management education production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
87. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
88. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
89. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
90. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
91. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
92. How can the value of Open management education be defined?
<--- Score
93. How do you hand over Open management education context?
<--- Score
94. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Open management education brings?
<--- Score
95. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
96. What is the definition of Open management education excellence?
<--- Score
97. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
98. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
99. Will team members perform Open management education work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
100. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
101. Who are the Open management education improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
103. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
104. What happens if Open management education’s scope changes?
<--- Score
105. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
106. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
107. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
108. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
109. Has the Open management education work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
111. What are the core elements of the Open management education business case?
<--- Score
112. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
113. How do you think the partners involved in Open management education would have defined success?
<--- Score
114. Is Open management education required?
<---