<--- Score
76. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Event planning brings?
<--- Score
79. Do you all define Event planning in the same way?
<--- Score
80. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
81. What are the core elements of the Event planning business case?
<--- Score
82. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
83. Is the Event planning scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
84. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
85. Who approved the Event planning scope?
<--- Score
86. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
87. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
88. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
89. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
90. Is the Event planning scope manageable?
<--- Score
91. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
92. Is there a Event planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
93. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
94. Is there a critical path to deliver Event planning results?
<--- Score
95. Are accountability and ownership for Event planning clearly defined?
<--- Score
96. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
97. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Event planning? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
99. What would be the goal or target for a Event planning’s improvement team?
<--- Score
100. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
101. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
102. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
103. Is there a clear Event planning case definition?
<--- Score
104. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
105. Have all basic functions of Event planning been defined?
<--- Score
106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Event planning activities?
<--- Score
107. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
108. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
109. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
110. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
111. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
112. What is the scope of Event planning?
<--- Score
113. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
114. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
115. When is/was the Event planning start date?
<--- Score
116. Has the Event planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
117. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
118. Who are the Event planning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
119. What Event planning requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
120. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
121. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
122. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
123. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
124. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
125. How have you defined all Event planning requirements first?
<--- Score
126. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
127. Is Event planning currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
128. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
129. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback