Score
114. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
115. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
116. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
117. Have all basic functions of Personally-identifiable information been defined?
<--- Score
118. How does the Personally-identifiable information manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
119. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
120. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
121. What is the context?
<--- Score
122. How would you define Personally-identifiable information leadership?
<--- Score
123. How did the Personally-identifiable information manager receive input to the development of a Personally-identifiable information improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
124. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
125. Is Personally-identifiable information required?
<--- Score
126. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
127. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
128. Is the Personally-identifiable information scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
129. What sources do you use to gather information for a Personally-identifiable information study?
<--- Score
130. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
131. When is/was the Personally-identifiable information start date?
<--- Score
132. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
133. Are accountability and ownership for Personally-identifiable information clearly defined?
<--- Score
134. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
135. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
136. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
137. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
138. What was the context?
<--- Score
139. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
140. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
141. Are the Personally-identifiable information requirements testable?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Personally-identifiable information Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Do you verify that corrective actions were taken?
<--- Score
2. What are the current costs of the Personally-identifiable information process?
<--- Score
3. What are the strategic priorities for this year?
<--- Score
4. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
5. What are hidden Personally-identifiable information quality costs?
<--- Score
6. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
7. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
8. What is the total fixed cost?
<--- Score
9. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?
<--- Score
10. How can you measure Personally-identifiable information in a systematic way?
<--- Score
11. Are the Personally-identifiable information benefits worth its costs?
<--- Score
12. What are the costs?
<--- Score
13. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
14. Does the Personally-identifiable information task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
15. Are Personally-identifiable information vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
16. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
17. Does a Personally-identifiable information quantification method exist?
<--- Score
18. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?
<--- Score
19. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
20. Where can you go to verify the info?
<--- Score
21. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
22. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
23. Are there competing Personally-identifiable information priorities?