<--- Score
57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
58. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
59. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
60. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
61. Who approved the Environmental health action plan scope?
<--- Score
62. How did the Environmental health action plan manager receive input to the development of a Environmental health action plan improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
63. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
64. What are the core elements of the Environmental health action plan business case?
<--- Score
65. Is Environmental health action plan linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
66. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
67. Is the Environmental health action plan scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
68. Do you all define Environmental health action plan in the same way?
<--- Score
69. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
71. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
72. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental health action plan’s improvement team?
<--- Score
73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
74. Is there any additional Environmental health action plan definition of success?
<--- Score
75. Has the Environmental health action plan work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
76. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
77. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
78. What Environmental health action plan services do you require?
<--- Score
79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
80. What is the scope?
<--- Score
81. What Environmental health action plan requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
82. What is the scope of the Environmental health action plan work?
<--- Score
83. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
84. Is special Environmental health action plan user knowledge required?
<--- Score
85. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
87. What is in scope?
<--- Score
88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
89. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
90. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
91. What was the context?
<--- Score
92. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
94. Is the scope of Environmental health action plan defined?
<--- Score
95. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental health action plan? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
96. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
97. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
98. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
99. Is there a clear Environmental health action plan case definition?
<--- Score
100. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
101. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
102. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental health action plan changes?
<--- Score
103. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
104. Is Environmental health action plan currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
105. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
107. Have all basic functions of Environmental health action plan been defined?
<--- Score
108. How do you hand over Environmental health action plan context?
<--- Score
109. How does the Environmental health action plan manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
110. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental health action plan