customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
59. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
60. Are accountability and ownership for Stakeholder engagement software clearly defined?
<--- Score
61. What was the context?
<--- Score
62. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
63. What are the Stakeholder engagement software tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
64. How do you manage unclear Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
65. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
66. What is in scope?
<--- Score
67. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
68. What is the definition of Stakeholder engagement software excellence?
<--- Score
69. What is the scope of the Stakeholder engagement software work?
<--- Score
70. What is the scope of the Stakeholder engagement software effort?
<--- Score
71. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
72. What would be the goal or target for a Stakeholder engagement software’s improvement team?
<--- Score
73. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
74. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
75. How do you catch Stakeholder engagement software definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
76. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
77. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
78. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Stakeholder engagement software changes?
<--- Score
79. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
80. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
81. What sources do you use to gather information for a Stakeholder engagement software study?
<--- Score
82. Have all basic functions of Stakeholder engagement software been defined?
<--- Score
83. Is there any additional Stakeholder engagement software definition of success?
<--- Score
84. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
85. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
86. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
87. Is there a critical path to deliver Stakeholder engagement software results?
<--- Score
88. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
89. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Stakeholder engagement software leverage and how?
<--- Score
90. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
91. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
92. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
93. Has a Stakeholder engagement software requirement not been met?
<--- Score
94. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
95. How can the value of Stakeholder engagement software be defined?
<--- Score
96. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
97. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
98. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
99. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Stakeholder engagement software?
<--- Score
100. Do you have a Stakeholder engagement software success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
101. Is there a clear Stakeholder engagement software case definition?
<--- Score
102. Are the Stakeholder engagement software requirements testable?
<--- Score
103. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
104. How do you hand over Stakeholder engagement software context?
<--- Score
105. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
106. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
107. Will a Stakeholder engagement software production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
108. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
109. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
110. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
111. How do you manage changes in Stakeholder engagement software requirements?
<--- Score
112. Is the Stakeholder engagement software scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
113. What Stakeholder engagement software services do you require?
<--- Score
114. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Stakeholder engagement