Score
9. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
10. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
11. What is the scope of the Wireless local area network effort?
<--- Score
12. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
13. When is/was the Wireless local area network start date?
<--- Score
14. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
15. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
16. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
17. What is the scope of the Wireless local area network work?
<--- Score
18. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
19. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
20. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Wireless local area network changes?
<--- Score
21. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
22. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Wireless local area network brings?
<--- Score
23. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
24. What are (control) requirements for Wireless local area network Information?
<--- Score
25. How have you defined all Wireless local area network requirements first?
<--- Score
26. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
27. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
28. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
29. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Wireless local area network leverage and how?
<--- Score
30. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
31. Is there a Wireless local area network management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
32. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
33. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
34. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
35. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
36. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
37. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
38. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
39. What are the Wireless local area network use cases?
<--- Score
40. Is the Wireless local area network scope manageable?
<--- Score
41. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
42. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
43. Do you all define Wireless local area network in the same way?
<--- Score
44. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
45. Will team members perform Wireless local area network work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
46. Are the Wireless local area network requirements complete?
<--- Score
47. Who approved the Wireless local area network scope?
<--- Score
48. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
49. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
50. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
51. Is special Wireless local area network user knowledge required?
<--- Score
52. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
53. What system do you use for gathering Wireless local area network information?
<--- Score
54. Are accountability and ownership for Wireless local area network clearly defined?
<--- Score
55. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
56. What sources do you use to gather information for a Wireless local area network study?
<--- Score
57. How do you gather Wireless local area network requirements?
<--- Score
58. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
59. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
60. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
61. Are improvement team members fully trained on Wireless local area network?
<--- Score
62. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score