Score
57. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
58. How does the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
59. What Ethereum Blockchain as a Service services do you require?
<--- Score
60. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
61. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
62. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
63. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
66. Is Ethereum Blockchain as a Service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
67. How will the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service team and the group measure complete success of Ethereum Blockchain as a Service?
<--- Score
68. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
69. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service requirements complete?
<--- Score
72. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
73. Is there any additional Ethereum Blockchain as a Service definition of success?
<--- Score
74. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
75. How did the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service manager receive input to the development of a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
76. When is/was the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service start date?
<--- Score
77. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
78. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Ethereum Blockchain as a Service work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
79. Who approved the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service scope?
<--- Score
80. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
81. How do you think the partners involved in Ethereum Blockchain as a Service would have defined success?
<--- Score
82. Is special Ethereum Blockchain as a Service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
83. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
84. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
85. Do you have a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
86. What are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
87. How are consistent Ethereum Blockchain as a Service definitions important?
<--- Score
88. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
89. Are the Ethereum Blockchain as a Service requirements testable?
<--- Score
90. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
91. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
92. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
93. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Ethereum Blockchain as a Service brings?
<--- Score
94. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
95. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
96. How would you define Ethereum Blockchain as a Service leadership?
<--- Score
97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Ethereum Blockchain as a Service results are met?
<--- Score
98. What is the scope of Ethereum Blockchain as a Service?
<--- Score
99. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
100. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
101. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
102. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
103. Will a Ethereum Blockchain as a Service production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
104. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
105. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
106. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
107. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
108. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
109. How do you manage unclear Ethereum Blockchain