4
What you are about to hear came to us recently in an email written by a very credible, famous person.
There is now a groundswell of interest around the country about this issue. KSCO and KOMY are privileged to be a part of disseminating this vital information which directly affects every taxpayer in the United States. The issue of how our own county supervisors are ripping us off Big-Time while directing the rest of us to take cuts and tighten our belts because of the budget deficit has been my own favorite and frustrating vendetta.
The author of the following takes the same issue to the federal level. Please stay with me. Together we can change laws that are wrong. Now for the email:
“I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of 9/11 casualty and those who die serving the country in uniform are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don’t criticize anything having to do with September 11th.
Well, I just can’t let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in the 9/11 attack, you’re going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.
Now, if you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,700 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there’s a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18.
When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt. Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1,185,000 (up to $4.7 million) are complaining that it is not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harm’s way for all of us, and they and their families know the dangers.
We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11th families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.
You see where this is going, don’t you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It is just really sad.
Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-cost housing. Does that make sense?
However, our own U.S. Congress just voted themselves a raise, and many of you do not know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month, and most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They also do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn’t have to pay into the system.
If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm’s way receive a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join the ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting. When do we finally do something about this? If this does not seem fair to you, it is time to forward this to as many people as you can.
Now, a little bit about Social Security.
Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years. Our senators and congressmen do not pay into Social Security. Many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan.. In recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. For all practical purposes, their plan works like this: When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die, except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments. For example, former Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7,800,000 - that’s Seven Million, Eight Hundred Thousand), with their wives drawing $275,000.00 during the last years of their lives. This is calculated on an average life span for each.
Their cost for this excellent plan is zero dollars. These little perks they have voted for themselves are free to them. You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Fund – our tax dollars at work.
From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into —every payday until we retire (with matching payments by our employer) – we can expect to get an average $1,000 per month after retirement. Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one month to equal Senator Bill Bradley’s benefits.
Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made. And that change would be to jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the senators and congressmen. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us, then watch how fast they would fix it. If enough people receive this email, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted, and maybe good changes will evolve. WE, each one of us – can make a difference.
Kudos to Rush Limbaugh for this fascinating email. For a copy, log on to www.ksco .com
5
As a longtime resident of this planet, and a lucky native-born of this incredible country, I need to speak out about why our United States, once the hope and promise of the world, is rapidly becoming weaker and unable to live up to its past expectations. It is our own goodness, generosity, and trusting nature which is destroying us. The topic is: Assimilation Versus Diversity. Let’s roll back the clock to around 1913 when my own European extended family was part of the greatest influx of immigrants to the United States. In the late 1920s, as a child, I saw how proud and grateful my family was to be here in America where they saw the hope and opportunity nonexistent in their native country. The one abiding desire of all immigrants at that time was to quickly learn to speak, read, and write in English – in short, to become truly American. It is called assimilation. That desire to be American in no way diminished the love that newcomers had for their own culture, history, and native language. They knew it was their responsibility to keep their own heritage alive, and they never expected their newly adopted country to do that for them.
Let’s fast-forward now to the early 1960s or thereabouts, when immigration surged again, from Mexico, Korea, Japan, China, Vietnam, and many other countries. It was then that the notion of diversity became very popular, and it was celebrated ad nauseam by the politically correct left.
Always motivated by feelings, never reality, the left felt that it was wonderful to have this mixture of cultures in the United States, and in many ways it is true, it was; however, the left, in its enthusiasm, felt that as a country, We The People were responsible for helping these newcomers keep their respective languages and cultures alive. Big big mistake So what happened? At that time, most new citizens came from Mexico and spoke only Spanish. Our public education system, led by leftist educators, created the program of “English As A Second Language”, whereby Mexican children receive most of their education in Spanish, so their parents and they did not have to learn English, so they remained primarily Mexican, but lived in America. That’s is called diversity? I call it disaster.
Now, let’s fast-forward to 2002, like now. As a result of 40 years of diversity, and the rejection of assimilation, many immigrants still do not understand English, but they do have the right to vote, so our voting ballots are now in many languages. This is stupid and wrong, and it is weakening and destroying the identity of our country. It is time to demand that to vote one must read, write, and understand English, and all ballots must be in English only, because English is our national language. What we have now is mass chaos and ghettos of different cultures. I say, tell political correctness and diversity to take a hike, because diversity divides, and assimilation brings unity.