Группа авторов

Magnetic Nanoparticles in Human Health and Medicine


Скачать книгу

As shown by Gazeau et al., the size selection of SPIONs with 30 nm in diameter increases their heating performance to 600 W gFe−1, at clinically relevant conditions (H × f = 4.1 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Gazeau et al. 2008).

      An alternative approach for increasing SPIONs heating rates turned out to be the control of their surface coating. It has been shown that dextran‐coated SPIONs with a diameter of 7 nm display a SAR value of 626 W gFe−1 (H × f = 6.25 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Mornet et al. 2004). Liu et al. reported a maximum SAR value of 930 W gFe−1 (H × f = 10.8×109 A m−1 s−1) when SPIONs with a diameter of 19 nm are coated with a 6 nm shell of phosphorylated methoxy polyethylene glycol 2000 (Liu et al. 2012). Interestingly, the high heating capacity of PEGylated SPIONs is maintained in various physiological conditions. On the other hand, the inorganic coating can also improve the SAR value of SPIONs. For example, Mohammad et al. found that the hyperthermic effect of SPIONs is four‐ to fivefold enhanced (920 W gFe−1) on coating with a gold shell of 0.5 thickness (Mohammad et al. 2010). A maximum SAR value of 1300 W gFe−1 (H × f = 7.9×109 A m−1 s−1) was measured for dumbbell‐like shaped dimers formed by an iron oxide domain of 24 nm in size and a gold seed of 9 nm in diameter (Guardia et al. 2017).

      As it was pointed out before, the second strategy for heat generation improvement consisted in tuning the effective anisotropy of IOMNPs by modifying their shape. It has been theoretically demonstrated that cubic MNPs have lower surface anisotropy compared to spheres due to a smaller amount of disordered spins (4 vs. 8%). Several experimental studies have confirmed this phenomenon. The comparison between cubic and spherical IOMNPs, with similar magnetic volumes, show an important increase of SAR values in the case of cubic IOMNPs: 356.2 vs. 189.6 W gFe−1 (H × f = 6 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Bauer et al. 2016); 314 vs. 140 W gFe−1 (H × f = 20 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Das et al. 2016); 395 vs. 150 W gFe−1 (H × f = 19.1 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Nemati et al. 2018) and 1963 vs. 410 W g−1 (H × f = 6.6 × 109 A m−1 s−1) (Elsayed et al. 2017). An extensive research on the heating properties of cubic IOMNPs with sizes ranging from 13 to 38 nm has been performed by Guardia et al. under different conditions of field and frequency (Guardia et al. 2012, 2014). They found that the nanocubes with a mean size of 19 nm exhibit SAR value as high as 2453 W gFe−1 (H × f =