in the Urban Environment, Wiley‐Blackwell, pp. 3–12.
57 Zhang, F. and Yang, X., 2020. Improving land cover classification in an urbanized coastal area by random forests: the role of variable selection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 251: 112105. DOI: org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112105.
58 Zhu, Z., 2017. Change detection using Landsat time series: a review of frequencies, preprocessing, algorithms, and applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 130: 370–384.
59 Zhu, Z., Zhou, Y., Seto, K.C., Stokes, E.C., Deng, C., Pickett, S.T. and Taubenböck, H., 2019. Understanding an urbanizing planet: strategic directions for remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 228: 164–182.
60 Zipper, S.C., Schatz, J., Singh, A., Kucharik, C.J., Townsend, P.A. and Loheide II, S.P., 2016. Urban heat island impacts on plant phenology: intra‐urban variability and response to land cover. Environmental Research Letters, 11(5): 054023.
PART II
Sensors and Systems for Urban Areas
Part II (Chapters 2–7) discusses several advanced and emerging platforms or systems, such as unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and social sensing, which offer new opportunities advancing urban studies. It begins with Chapter 2 discussing an effort to examine urban built‐up volume through three‐dimensional analyses with lidar and radar data. The authors used spaceborne radar data to monitor built‐up volume that was further validated with lidar data. Chapter 3 discusses the opportunities and challenges of UAS for urban studies. UAS platforms represent a new frontiers of remote sensing applications. The remaining chapters (Chapters 4–7) in Part II focus on big geotagged‐data from mobile phones, social media, vehicle trajectories, and street views, which provide new opportunities for understanding human behaviors and characteristics of cities. Chapter 4 reviews various analytical methods, such as temporal signature analysis, text analysis, and image analysis, for social sensing research. Chapter 5 reviews the utilities of ground‐based street view images for urban remote sensing research. Chapter 6 discusses the usefulness of social media outlets such as Twitter for geographic research on human activities in urban areas. Finally, Chapter 7 discusses the potential of integrating remote sensor data with location‐based social media data to examine socioeconomic dynamics.
CHAPTER 2 Examining Urban Built‐up Volume: Three‐Dimensional Analyses with Lidar and Radar Data
Adam J. Mathews1 and Son V. Nghiem2
1 Department of Geography, Environment, and Tourism, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
2 NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Abstract
Remotely sensed data products such as satellite images have long been utilized to monitor the urban environment and quantify changes. While useful for certain studies, image‐based approaches often lack three‐dimensional (3D) information (the vertical dimension) for comprehensive analyses of vertical change (1D) in addition to lateral change (2D). This chapter introduces light detection and ranging (lidar)‐based modeling of the urban environment, specifically focusing on quantifying built‐up volume and modeling its change within urban areas using multi‐temporal data. In addition, the chapter introduces readers to recent advancements in incorporating spaceborne radar data (e.g. from satellite scatterometer), validated with lidar data, to monitor built‐up volume free from the limitations of high cost, and small area coverage. Finally, the chapter includes discussion of the physical basis and future extension of high‐resolution data synergistically from multiple satellite synthetic aperture radars (SARs).
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Characterizing and quantifying changes in the urban environment are of the utmost importance as the urban population continues to grow on all continents; from 1950 to 2014, population in urban areas increased from 746 million to nearly four billion (United Nations 2014). Urban population growth, corresponding changes within the urban environment (e.g. increasingly built‐up), and the effects these changes have on the environment require new remote sensing data and methodological approaches. Despite tremendous progress in the field of remote sensing over the past several decades (Gutman et al. 2004), Land Cover/Land Use Change (LCLUC) and Earth surface analyses and modeling efforts have, to date, primarily relied on passive remote sensing data and analysis techniques. Specifically, data are commonly satellite imagery provided by the Landsat series and more recently the Sentinel series, and implemented methods are image classification techniques such as pixel‐ (unsupervised and supervised; Masek et al. 2000) and object‐based approaches (Myint et al. 2011), image ratios/indices (Zha et al. 2003), and night‐time light mapping (Small and Elvidge 2013; Zhang and Seto 2013) that only account for two‐dimensional (2D) Earth surface dynamics.
Importantly, however, in urban environments, the vertical dimension is a vital component to comprehensively evaluate Earth surface processes and their influence on environmental characteristics such as temperature (i.e. urban heat island; Imhoff et al. 2010), precipitation (Kaufmann et al. 2007), air circulation and quality (Jacobson et al. 2019), pollution (Stevenazzi et al. 2015), groundwater vulnerability (Stevenazzi et al. 2014, 2017), and more (e.g. biodiversity, Seto et al. 2012). Urban areas can change in the vertical dimension through upward growth (i.e. new buildings) or downward decline (i.e. demolishing buildings). Unfortunately, data availability issues – mainly, lack of adequate light detection and ranging (lidar) or similar data (e.g. altimetry sensors, photogrammetrically derived Three‐Dimensional (3D) information) – have restricted many remote sensing scientists to 2D examinations due to major data gaps in temporal data records (annual to decadal) and in spatial coverage (regional to global). In addition, other potential 3D data sources, e.g. radio detection and ranging (radar) data of a variety of types and from several satellite platforms, have undergone limited testing for use in urban remote sensing though with promising results (e.g. Gamba and Houshmand 2002; Sportouche et al. 2011; Nghiem et al. 2017; Nguyen et al. 2018; Mathews et al. 2019).
This chapter provides an overview of 3D geospatial data and methodologies for examination of built‐up volume (primarily, buildings) in the urban environment specifically emphasizing lidar‐ and radar‐based approaches. The sections that follow provide background on 3D data sources, delve more deeply into lidar data and methodologies including a brief case study, an equivalent section for radar data and methods, an outlook section discussing future advancements and challenges, and concluding remarks.
2.2 THREE‐DIMENSIONAL (3D) GEOSPATIAL DATA FOR URBAN REMOTE SENSING
While 3D data can be generated from remotely sensed imagery by way of photogrammetric techniques (e.g. photogrammetric bundle‐block adjustment, Structure from Motion computer vision), active remote sensing technologies, such as lidar and radar, provide the bulk of the 3D geospatial data for Earth's surface. With regard to these 3D data, two characteristics become critical for urban remote sensing of built‐up volume and change: (i) spatial resolution and coverage,