Douglas Jacobsen

What is Christianity?


Скачать книгу

Roman Imperial Church became the exception to this rule. Rome was a legalistic society, and the Roman Imperial Church imbibed that tendency toward legalism. Romans assumed that there really was one best and proper way to do everything, and the purpose of the law was to identify and enforce that one correct path. In earlier centuries, Christian communities had negotiated their way toward consensual agreements that mitigated conflict but simultaneously allowed reasonable differences to remain. This was true even of the Great Church before Constantine. As the church and the Roman state became more closely aligned, however, it became harder to maintain even a minimal degree of organizational graciousness. The Imperial Church wanted uniformity, and that desire eventually caused the larger Christian movement to snap under the pressure. A Great Division took place, and the formerly diverse but loosely connected Christian movement became three separate and distinct Christian traditions.

      The Great Division

      The Great Division is a watershed moment in the history of Christianity, not only because of the three new traditions that were created, but also because these three traditions soon came to dominate the entire Christian movement. Various independent, local Christian groups that had previously gone their own ways now felt compelled to choose sides. Christians in Georgia and Ireland, for example, chose to align with the Chalcedonian tradition, while Christians in Armenia and Ethiopia joined the Miaphysite movement. The consolidation of Christianity into three large and distinct communities, each nurturing its own tradition, permanently reshaped Christianity, and the space for smaller alternative visions of Christianity shrank to almost nothing (see Figure 1.2).

      The flashpoint for the Great Division was Christology; the three groups held decidedly different views about who Jesus was and about the purpose of his life and death. Chalcedonians said that the human and divine natures were connected, but neither merged nor confused, in the one person of Christ. Miaphysites disagreed. They asserted that the human and the divine were fully merged and united in Christ, and they were convinced that salvation could occur only because God the Creator had literally felt the pain of death on the cross. It was God’s full identification with the human condition, even to the point of death, that made salvation possible. The idea that God can experience emotions and fully understand the suffering of humankind is something that many modern Christians would agree with almost instinctively, but the Chalcedonian tradition (in opposition to the Miaphysite view) rejected this possibility, saying that God the Father was apatheia (non-feeling) and unmoved by earthly matters. For Chalcedonians, only an unchanging God had the power to guarantee eternal salvation, while Miaphysites believed that only a truly passionate God could and would try to save humankind.

      Theological differences alone do not create a schism. Breaks as significant as the Great Division require an institutional component, as well, and that component was largely supplied by Jacob Baradeus (500–578), bishop of the city of Edessa (in what is now southern Turkey). During the middle of the sixth century, bishop Jacob traveled thousands of miles back and forth across the Middle East (both within and outside the Roman Empire) in order to ordain hundreds of priests and dozens of bishops to be part of a new Miaphysite church hierarchy standing in opposition to the Roman Imperial Church and the Chalcedonian beliefs it championed. Because of his efforts, the Miaphysite tradition (especially in Syria) is also known as the Jacobite Church. Non-Chalcedonian Christians in Egypt had established their own institutional independence even earlier under the leadership of a Miaphysite bishop called Timothy the Cat (d. 477). Miaphysite Christians living within the borders of the Roman Empire were sometimes subjected to brutal persecution by the Roman government (with the support and blessing of the Imperial Chalcedonian-oriented Church), which Miaphysite Christians interpreted as indisputable evidence that Chalcedonian Christianity was itself heretical. How, they asked, could any follower of Jesus condone such violence against other Christian believers when Jesus himself had commanded his disciples to love each other?

      Figure 1.3 Diagram of the Great Division summarizing Christological differences.

      The Church of the East was the most missionary-minded of the three traditions formed by the Great Division, and its missionary-monks spread the gospel all along the Silk Road, a series of ancient trade routes that meandered across Central Asia and connected China with the Middle East. The cities and towns that dotted the Silk Road tended to be religiously diverse, as trade centers often are, and Christians in this environment quickly ascertained that an embracing message of welcome was much more effective than criticizing other religions. Church of the East missionaries reached the Chinese capital city of Chang’an (known as Xi’an today) in the year 635. The Chinese emperor was deeply impressed by their positive message, which focused on Christ as a teacher and stressed the virtues of kindness and compassion. One Church of the East sutra (poetic sermon) from those years reads in part:

      Every being takes its refuge in You

      And the light of Your Holy Compassion frees us all…

      Great Teacher, I stand in awe of the Father.

      Great Teacher, I am awed by the Holy Lord.

      Great Teacher, I am speechless before the King of the Dharma.

      Great Teacher, I am dazzled by the Enlightened Mind –

      Great Teacher, you do everything to save us.

      The Chinese emperor dubbed Christianity the “religion of light,” and he permitted the Church of the East to build monasteries wherever it desired. The Church of the East flourished in China until the mid-800s when China took a sudden xenophobic