Группа авторов

Atlas of Endoscopic Ultrasonography


Скачать книгу

a relatively thick mucosal layer (layers I and II). Image is taken with a 20 MHz catheter probe.

images

      1 Interface echo between the superficial mucosa and water (hyperechoic).

      2 Deep mucosa (hypoechoic).

      3 Submucosa plus the acoustic interface between the submucosa and muscularis propria (hyperechoic).

      4 Muscularis propria minus the acoustic interface between the submucosa and muscularis propria (hypoechoic).

      5 Serosa and subserosal fat (hyperechoic).

      1 Epithelial interface (hyperechoic).

      2 Epithelium (hypoechoic).

      3 Lamina propria plus the acoustic interface between the lamina propria and the muscularis mucosae (hyperechoic).

      4 Muscularis mucosae minus the acoustic interface between the lamina propria and muscularis mucosae (hypoechoic).

      5 Submucosa plus the acoustic interface between the submucosa and inner muscularis propria (hyperechoic).

      6 Inner muscularis propria minus interface between the submucosa and inner muscularis propria (hypoechoic).

      7 Fibrous tissue band separating the inner and outer muscularis propria layers (hyperechoic).

      8 Outer muscularis propria (hypoechoic).

      9 Serosa and subserosal fat (hyperechoic).

images

      In conclusion, the only available in vivo method for examining the full thickness of the GI wall, beyond the mucosal surface, is EUS. It provides gastroenterologists with a valuable diagnostic tool to assess pathology in the GI tract to help guide clinical management of the patient. Selection of the correct transducer and using good technique are important in obtaining high‐quality images. When imaging the wall of the GI tract, the method of acoustic coupling is critical. Without good acoustic coupling to the mucosal surface, high‐quality images cannot be obtained. The highest frequency available should be used to image the wall of the GI tract since deep penetration is not necessary unless imaging a large tumor arising from the wall. Using a higher frequency transducer will result in better resolution and allow for better identification of the layers involved. Lower frequencies may be required to identify the size of a mass and if there is involvement with any adjacent structures (T‐staging), and to assess nodal involvement (N‐staging).

      Chapter video clip

       Kapil Gupta

      Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

      Endoscopic ultrasound provides excellent imaging of the biliary tree and gallbladder. Using radial and linear echoendoscope, visualization of the bile duct is performed from two main stations: from the duodenal bulb and from the second portion of the duodenum. The gallbladder is usually seen from the duodenal bulb or the antrum of the stomach. As the entire biliary tree can be visualized only using linear echoendoscope, more endosonographers are primarily using linear echoendoscope for evaluating bile duct anatomy.

      The echoendoscope is advanced through the pylorus into the duodenal bulb. To achieve this, the scope is usually in a long position along the greater curvature. The big wheel is then turned downwards and the scope is either turned slightly clockwise or the small wheel rotated slightly to the right to deflect the tip of the echoendoscope towards the apex of the duodenal bulb and impacted there. To achieve a stable position the balloon can be inflated, which helps in maintaining the tip of the scope in the bulb.