Pierre Rosanvallon

The Populist Century


Скачать книгу

133

      136  134

      137  135

      138  136

      139  137

      140  138

      141  139

      142  140

      143  141

      144  142

      145  143

      146  144

      147  145

      148  146

      149  147

      150  148

      151  149

      152  150

      153  151

      154  152

      155  153

      156  154

      157  155

      158  156

      159  157

      160  158

      161  159

      162  160

      163  161

      164  162

      165  163

      166  164

      167  165

      168  166

      169  167

      170  168

      171  169

      172  170

      173  171

      174  201

      175 202

      176 203

      177 204

      178 205

      179 206

      180 207

      181 208

      182 209

      183 210

      184 211

      185  212

      186 213

      187 214

      188 215

      189 216

      190 217

      191 218

      192 219

      193 220

      194 221

      195 222

      196 223

      197  224

      History, Theory, Critique

      Pierre Rosanvallon

      Translated by Catherine Porter

      polity

      Originally published in French as Le siècle du populisme: Histoire, théorie, critique

      © Editions du Seuil, 2020

      This English edition © Polity Press, 2021

      Polity Press

      65 Bridge Street

      Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK

      Polity Press

      101 Station Landing

      Suite 300

      Medford, MA 02155, USA

      All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.

      ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-4628-2

      ISBN-13: 978-1-5095-4629-9 (paperback)

      A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

      Library of Congress Control Number: 2021938630

      by Fakenham Prepress Solutions, Fakenham, Norfolk NR21 8NL

      The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.

      Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.

      For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com

      Populism is revolutionizing twenty-first-century politics. But the disruption it brings has not yet been assessed with any degree of accuracy. The word may turn up everywhere, but no theory of the phenomenon has emerged. The term combines a look of intuitive self-evidence with a fuzzy form, as attested first and foremost by the semantic slipperiness manifested in its usage. For it is a decidedly malleable word, so erratic are its uses. The term is paradoxical, too: even though it is derived from the positive foundations of democratic life, it most often has a pejorative connotation. It is also a screen word, for it applies a single label to a whole set of contemporary political mutations whose complexity and deepest wellsprings need to be grasped. Is it appropriate, for instance, to use the same term to characterize Chávez’s Venezuela, Orbán’s Hungary, and Duterte’s Philippines, not to mention a figure like Trump? Does it make sense to put the Spaniards of Podemos and the followers of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s movement, La France Insoumise (France Unbowed), in the same basket with the fervent supporters of Marine Le Pen, Matteo Salvini, or Nigel Farage? To understand something requires making distinctions; it is essential to resist simplifying amalgamations. Populism is a dubious notion, finally, because it often serves only to stigmatize adversaries, or to legitimize old claims by the powerful and the educated that they are superior to the “lower” classes, which are always deemed likely to mutate into plebeians governed by sinister passions. We cannot address the question of populism without keeping this observation in mind, as a caveat as well as a call for political lucidity and intellectual rigor in approaching the subject.