Группа авторов

Non-halogenated Flame Retardant Handbook


Скачать книгу

finishing don’t need to be di- or multifunctional. For many years the product of the addition of dimethyl phosphite to acrylamide followed by methylolation (Formula 2.15) was marketed for cotton and cotton-based blends [258]. This product is fixed on the cellulose using an amino resin and an acid curing catalyst. A recent academic study [259] shows that use of titanium dioxide as a co-catalyst for cotton textile treatment improves the flame retardant efficiency especially after laundering. It has a mild formaldehyde odor because it contains some components with less well bound formaldehyde [260]. This product is not used in the USA and has limited use in Europe because of potential formaldehyde exposure. There are methods of decreasing formaldehyde release [261] and it is believed that they are used commercially. A recent patent application [262] shows use of this product on lyocell fibers where it is introduced in the spinning solution.

      Other commercial aliphatic phosphates e.g., tributyl phosphate, triethoxybutyl phosphate and tri-2-ethylhexyl phosphate can be used as a flame retardants or part of a flame-retardant mixture, but their major use is in other areas. Therefore, they are out of the scope of this chapter.

      Typical applications of TCP and CDP are in PVC tarpaulins, mine conveyer belts, air ducts, cable insulation, and vinyl films. These phosphates are usually used in blends with phthalates. The proportion of the more expensive phosphate is usually chosen such as to permit the product to reliably pass the flammability specifications. Other uses of CDP are in various rubbers, polyisocyanurate foams [286], semi-rigid PU foams in combination with expandable graphite [287], in phenolic and epoxy laminates [288] and as a plasticizer in epoxy-based coatings [289].