and similarly for
where the x(j)s are of coradical filtration degree 1, hence primitive. But, we also have:
[1.29]
Hence, the element
Now consider a nonzero element
By minimality hypothesis on d(u), we then get Σ(u) u′ ⊗ u″ = 0. Hence, u is primitive, that is, d(u) = 1, a contradiction. Hence, φ is injective. The compatibility with the original filtration or graduation is obvious. □
Now, let ℋ : ∪n ≥ 0 ℋn be a connected filtered Hopf algebra and let
PROPOSITION 1.12.–
where is the Lie algebra of infinitesimal characters with values in the base field k, where stands for its enveloping algebra, and (—)° stands for the graded dual.
In the case when the Hopf algebra ℋ is not commutative, it is no longer possible to reconstruct it from G1(k).
1.3.7. Renormalization in connected filtered Hopf algebras
In this section we describe the renormalization à la Connes-Kreimer (Connes and Kreimer 1998; Kreimer 2002) in the abstract context of connected filtered Hopf algebras: the objects to be renormalized are characters with values in a commutative unital target algebra
where φ+ is an
Here, we consider the situation where the algebra
with
THEOREM 1.2.–
1 1) Let ℋ be a connected filtered Hopf algebra. Let be the group of those , such that endowed with the convolution product. Any admits a unique Birkhoff decomposition:
[1.30]
where φ− sends 1 to and Ker ε into , and φ+ sends ℋ into . The maps φ- and φ+ are given on Ker ε by the following recursive formulae:
[1.31]
[1.32]
1 2) If the algebra is commutative and if φ is a character, the components φ- and φ+ occurring in the Birkhoff decomposition of χ are characters as well.
PROOF .– The proof goes along the same lines as the proof of Theorem 4 from Connes and Kreimer (1998): for the first assertion, it is immediate from the definition of π that φ- sends Ker ε into