Группа авторов

Algebra and Applications 2


Скачать книгу

alt="image"/>, which interact as follows (Manchon and Saidi 2011):

      [1.79]image

      The first pre-Lie operation ⊲ comes from the fact that image is an augmented operad, whereas the second pre-Lie operation → comes from the fact that image is the pre-Lie operad itself! Similarly:

      THEOREM 1.4.– The free pre-Lie algebra with d generators is the vector space of rooted trees with d colors, endowed with grafting.

      In this section we give a direct proof of Theorem 1.4 without using operads. It is similar to the proof of the main theorem in Chapoton and Livernet (2001) about the structure of the pre-Lie operad, except that we consider unlabeled trees. We stick to d = 1 (i.e. one generator), the proof for several generators being completely analogous. Let

be the vector space spanned by rooted trees. First, the grafting operation is pre-Lie, because for any trees s, t and u in
, the expression:

      [1.80]image

      is obtained by summing up all of the possibilities of grafting s and t at some vertex of u. As such, it is obviously symmetric in s and t. Now let (A, ⊳) be any left pre-lie algebra, and choose any aA. In order to prove Theorem 1.4 for one generator, we have to show that there is a unique pre-Lie algebra morphism image, such that Fa(•) = a. For the first trees, we easily obtain:

image

      Can we continue like this? We proceed by double induction, first, on the number of vertices, second, on the number of branches, that is, the valence of the root. Write any tree t with n vertices as t = B+ (t1,…, tk), where the tjs are the branches and B+ is the operator that grafts the branches on a common extra root. By the induction hypothesis on n, the images Fa(tj) are well-defined.

image

      shows that, if Fa(t) exists, it is uniquely defined by:

      What remains to be shown is that this expression does not depend on the choice of the distinguished branch t1. In order to see this, choose a second branch (say t2), and consider the expression:

      [1.82]image

      which is obtained by grafting t1 and t2 on B+(t3, … , tk). This expression is the sum of five terms:

      1 1) T1, obtained by grafting t1 and t2 on the root. It is nothing but the tree t itself.

      2 2) T2, obtained by grafting t1 on the root and t2 elsewhere.

      3 3) T3, obtained by grafting t2 on the root and t1 elsewhere.

      4 4) T4, obtained by grafting t1 on some branch and t2 on some other branch.

      5 5) T5, obtained by grafting t1 and t2 on the same branch.

      The terms Fa(T2) + Fa(T3), Fa(T4) and Fa(T5) are well-defined by the induction hypothesis on the number of branches, and are obviously symmetric in t1 and t2. We thus arrive at:

image

      Loday and Ronco (2010) have found a deep link between pre-Lie algebras and commutative Hopf algebras of a certain type: let ℋ be a commutative Hopf algebra. Following this, we say that ℋ is right-sided if it is free as a commutative algebra, that is, ℋ = S(V) for some k-vector space V, and if the reduced coproduct verifies:

      [1.83]image

      Suppose that V = n ≥ 0 is graded with finite-dimensional homogeneous components. Then, the graded dual A = V0 is a left pre-Lie algebra, and by the Milnor-Moore theorem, the graded dual ℋ0 is isomorphic to the enveloping algebra image as graded Hopf algebra. Conversely, for any graded pre-Lie algebra A, the graded dual image is free commutative right-sided (Loday and Ronco 2010, Theorem 5.3).

      The Hopf algebra ℋCK of rooted forests enters into this framework, and, as it was first explicited in Chapoton (2001), the associated pre-Lie algebra is the free pre-Lie algebra of rooted trees with grafting: to see this, denote by (δs) the dual basis in the graded dual image of the forest basis of ℋCK. The correspondence δ : sδs extends linearly to a unique vector space isomorphism from ℋCK onto image. For any tree t, the corresponding δt is an infinitesimal character of ℋCK, that is, it is a primitive element of ℋ°. We denote by * the (convolution) product of ℋ°. We have:

      [1.84]image

      Here, tu is obtained by grafting t on u, namely:

      [1.85]image

      where N′(t, u, v) is the number of