beans are stored at appropriate temperatures and humidity levels. However, Santos and Furlong (2021) reported that the incidence of biological contaminants in dry beans and other pulses presents a potential food safety challenge since these contaminants can affect quality at different points in the production and marketing chain. Their presence can have severe impact on consumers’ health, either by a direct toxic effect or by effecting nutritional deficiencies due to toxicity. Therefore, such food safety risks should be carefully estimated, and appropriate steps should be taken to eliminate or minimize such risks during storage and handling of dry beans.
The federal standards for handling of food grade materials mandate segregation and security of product ingredients. It is particularly important to maintain strict segregation of beans from known food allergens (especially soybean, wheat, peanuts, and other nuts). The FDA requires mandatory labeling of foods containing allergen (FDA 2004). Shipment of foods that are inadequately labeled is the primary reason for product recalls. Thus, cross‐contamination of beans with any allergens is a major issue under the FDA guidelines and warrants strict controls.
Additional guidelines are outlined through good manufacturing practices (GMPs) for food products, the ISO 9000 standards and HACCP guidelines (Aber et al. 2018). It is essential that food grade materials be maintained in secure and identifiable lots so that they may be tracked from point of origin through use. Further, it is of maximum benefit to ensure reduction of cross‐contamination points when using these bulk container totes. Lot identification on the point of shipping package (identifying placard) and a scannable bar code provide significant opportunities for product procurement control procedures.
SUMMARY
Harvesting of dry beans at appropriate maturity and uniform moisture content is imperative for the overall quality raw and processed dry beans. Similarly, the postharvest handling and storage of dry beans is an important aspect in providing high‐quality processed bean products. It must be emphasized that dry beans require careful handling and monitoring to ensure stability throughout their postharvest lifespan. Thus, it is important to move dry beans from field production to the final processing facilities in a controlled and sequential manner throughout the value chain. The handling, storage, and transportation of beans to end users require receiving, cleaning, and separation and continuous control of bean storage conditions. Bean facilities equipped with controlled aeration and drying capabilities are needed to assure quality stability. Postharvest storage quality changes are influenced by environmental factors such as bean moisture content, storage temperature and storage time. A careful and strict monitoring of beans is essential assure satisfactory stability. Packaging of beans facilitates the logistical handling and may be in various intermediate forms (bulk totes or bags) and small value‐added retail consumer packages. Successful market distribution is achieved only through controlled and monitored bean handling and integrated food safety systems.
REFERENCES
1 Aber, H., Mulindwa, J., Lung’aho, M., Nyakundi, F., Jager, M. & Ugen, M. (2018). Development of a food safety toolkit for dry common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Uganda using a hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) approach. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 18: 13677–13701.
2 ADM (Archer Daniels Midland) (2017). Handbook for better edible bean production. Available at: https://assets.adm.com/Products‐And‐Services/Food‐Ingredients/Edible‐Beans/Handbook_for_Better_Edible_Bean_Production_2017_ed.pdf (accessed March 23, 2021).
3 Aguilera, J.M. & Rivera, J. (1990). Storage and handling of black beans. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 14: 423–435.
4 Ahnen, R.T., Jonnalagadda, S.S. & Slavin, J.L. (2019). Role of plant protein in nutrition, wellness, and health. Nutrition Reviews 77: 735–747.
5 Anthony, J.P., Mongelli, A.C. & Kindya, W.C. (1982). Update: Dry cranberry bean test shipments. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 7(1): 10–11.
6 Anon. (1978). Postharvest food losses on developing countries. Washington, DC, National Academy of Science. 52p.
7 Bassett, A., Kamfwa, K., Ambachew, D. & Cichy, K. (2021). Genetic variability and genome‐wide association analysis of flavor and texture in cooked beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 134: 959–978.
8 Bernhofen, D.M., El‐Sahli, Z. & Kneller, R. (2016). Estimating the effects of the container revolution on world trade. Journal of International Economics 98: 36–50.
9 Beuchat, L.R., & Lechowich, R.V. (1970). Aflatoxins: Production on beans as affected by temperature and moisture content. Journal of Milk & Food Technology 33: 373–376.
10 Bingen, J., and Siyengo, A. (2002). Standards and corporate reconstruction in the Michigan dry bean industry. Agriculture and Human Values 19: 311–323.
11 Bolles, A.D., Uebersax, M.A. & Hosfield, G.L. (1982). Contamination of packaging material in processed beans. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 6(4): 15–16.
12 Bradford, K.J., Dahal, P., Van Asbrouck, J., Kunusoth, K., Bello, P., Thompson, J. & Wu, F. (2018). The dry chain: Reducing postharvest losses and improving food safety in humid climates. Trends in Food Science & Technology 71: 84–93.
13 Burr, H.K., Kon, S. & Morris, H.J. (1968). Cooking rates of dry beans as influenced by moisture content and temperature and time of storage. Food Technology 22: 88–90.
14 Buttery, R.G., Guadagni, D.G. & Ling, L.C. (1976). Geosmin, a musty off‐flavor of dry beans. Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry 24: 419–420.
15 Cardoso, M.L., Bartosik, R.E., Rodríguez, J.C. & Ochandio, D. (2008). Factors affecting carbon dioxide concentration in interstitial air of soybean stored in hermetic plastic bags (silo‐bag). In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Controlled Atmosphere and Fumigation in Stored Products. Chengdu, China (21–26 September).
16 Chambers IV, E., Smith, E.C., Seitz, L.M. & Sauer, D.B. (1998). Sensory properties of musty compounds in food. Developments in Food Science 40: 173–180.
17 Chu, J., Ho, P. & Orfila, C. (2020). Growth region impacts cell wall properties and hard‐to‐cook phenotype of canned navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Food and Bioprocess Technology 13: 818–826.
18 Dhahir, J. (1987). Effect of selected storage conditions on development of hard‐to‐cook phenomenon in dry beans. PhD Dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing. 147p.
19 Eckert, F.R., Kandel, H.J., Johnson, B.L., Rojas‐Cifuentes, G.A., Deplazes, C., Vander Wal, A.J. & Osorno, J.M. (2011). Seed yield and loss of dry bean cultivars under conventional and direct harvest. Agronomy Journal 103: 129–136.
20 Fairley, C.A. (2007). Application of solid phase micro‐extraction with gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry for the determination of geosmin and 2‐methylisoborneol in processed navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). PhD Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 81p.
21 FDA (Food and Drug Administration US). (2004). Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004 (FALCPA). Public Law 108–282, Title II. Available at https://www.fda.gov/food/food‐allergensgluten‐free‐guidance‐documents‐regulatory‐information/food‐allergen‐labeling‐and‐consumer‐protection‐act‐2004‐falcpa (accessed July 21, 2020).
22 Gilham, B., Hall, R. & Woods, J.L. (2018). Vegetables and legumes in new Australasian food launches: how are they being used and are they a healthy choice? Nutrition Journal 17: 1–9.
23 Grizzell, W.G., Perry, J.S. & Sefcovic, M.S. (1961). Handling pea beans in country elevators. Washington, DC: USDA Market Research Report # 479. 20p.
24 Iamanaka, B.T., Teixeira, A.A., Teixeira,