Группа авторов

Small Animal Laparoscopy and Thoracoscopy


Скачать книгу

href="#ulink_b5382133-dcc8-5bf3-b9f0-cf793d2e39db">Figure 2). This was a milestone and a prerequisite for the laparoscopic revolution that followed; a surgeon simply cannot perform advanced procedure crouched over an eye‐piece. His development also made him one of the most controversial figures in the movement of minimally invasive technology. Opponents of MIS accused laparoscopists like Nezhat to hide their complication rates and advancing dangerous methods for personal gain. A couple of high‐profiled lawsuits in the early 2000s triggered nationwide media coverage, as Nezhat was accused of medical malpractice and racketeering. Both suits were dismissed, and the allegations were considered frivolous lawsuits in the one case, and the attorney in the second was subsequently charged with contempt of court. Allegations of research fraud were made against Nezhat, all which were found unsubstantiated.

Photo depicts laparoscopy performed in 19 74, before the introduction of video laparoscopy.

      Source:Courtesy of Dr. David C. Twedt.

      Fortunately, some surgeons saw these hard‐earned achievements for their true value and by early 1990s laparoscopic appendectomies were performed by these early adaptors in vast numbers. Shortly thereafter the “laparoscopic revolution” broke out and suddenly Semm's and Nezhat's expertise and publications were in great demand. Finally, in 2002 Semm received the Pioneer in endoscopy award from the Board of Governors of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) [5]. Nezhat also has won numerous awards and honors from prestigious societies like ACOG, ACS, ASRM, and the Excel Award from the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

      With the human laparoscopic physicians leading the way, small animal MIS has not been nearly as controversial as its human counterpart. Like in the medical field, MIS was fairly slow to be incorporated in general veterinary clinical practice. Our development appears to parallel that of human surgery, but with an approximately 20‐year delay. A “laparoscopic revolution” like that in the human medical field cannot yet be claimed by veterinary surgeons, but MIS is steadily moving the stakes forward with more frequent use and improved surgical technique.

      Early Work: 1970s

      The first reports on laparoscopy in small animals were conducted on dogs in the early 1900s, but this was mainly experimental models prior to application in humans. Like gynecologists, theriogenologists were among the earliest clinical adapters of MIS in research and clinical veterinary medicine, during the 1950s and 1960s. However, in the early 1970s, work with diagnostic laparoscopy was emerging in the small animal field. Surgical application was sparse but David E. Wildt, a non‐DVM Ph D affiliated with the Division of Research Services at National Institute of Health, reported on male and female sterilization by occlusion of the vas deferens and uterine horn, respectively, in the early 1980s. Dr. Wildt, coedited the first textbook in 1980 on animal laparoscopy together with Richard Harrison, PhD, at Tulane University [7].

      Source: Courtesy of Dr. David C. Twedt.

Photo depicts a proctoscope is used as a low-cost laparoscope for visualization of a liver biopsy in the 1970s.

      Source: Courtesy of Dr. David C. Twedt.

Photo depicts a Corkmaster, a carbon dioxide dispenser intended for opening wine bottles, adapted for generation of capnoperitoneum used by Drs. Twedt and Johnson in the 1970s.

      MIS Takes Off in Small Animal Surgery: The 2000s and Beyond

      Arthroscopy was the first globally embraced veterinary MIS technique, but this text is mainly focusing on the soft tissue MIS division. Here, it would take another two decades before MIS would be more commonly used in small animal surgery. In 2009, the American College of Surgeons added a requirement for MIS in the resident training programs.

      Development of increasingly advanced clinical techniques are currently ongoing at a fast pace, and important contributions over the last two decades have been made by Drs Gilles Dupre, Phil Mayhew, Brad Case, and Ameet Singh. Dr. Mayhew remains one of the most prolific and important contributors of scientific clinical work in the area of small