G., Rivas S. y Ochoa de Toledo, M. (2012). Resultados preliminares de la aplicación de un Diseño Instruccional con enfoque Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS) para la enseñanza del contenido del Sistema Nervioso. Revista de Investigación, 82 (38), 13-36.
Atwood, H.L., y Karunanithi, S. (2002). Diversification of synaptic strength: Presynaptic elements. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(7), 497-516.
Ausubel, D. P. (1976). Psicología educativa. Un punto de vista cognoscitivo. Ed. Trillas. México.
Benfenati, F. (2007). Synaptic plasticity and the neurobiology of learning and memory. Acta Biomed, 78(1), 58-66.
Buzsaki, G. (2013). Cognitive Neuroscience Time, Space and Memory. Nature, 497(7451), 568-569.
Bodizs, R., Bekesy, M., Szucs, A., Barsi, P. y Halasz, P. (2002). Sleep-dependent hippocampal slow activity correlates with waking mewmory performance in humans. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 78(2), 441-457.
Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. En S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chinn, C. A. y Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
Cowan, W. M. y Kandel, E. R. (2001). A brief history of synapses and synaptic transmission. Synapses (pp.1-88). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Cozolino, L. (2013). The Social Neuroscience of Education: Optimizing Attachment and Learning in the Classroom. W.W. Norton, New York, NY.
Dehaene, S. (2019). ¿Cómo aprendemos? Los cuatro pilares con los que la educación puede potenciar los talentos de nuestro cerebro (1a ed.). Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno Editores Argentina. ISBN 978-987-629-969-5.
diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why „conceptual ecology“ is a good idea. Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice (pp. 28-60). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Duit, R. (1996). The constructivist view in science education. What it has to offer and what should not be expected from it. Investigaçôes em ensino de ciências, 1(1), 40-75.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography STCSE – Teachers’ and Students’ Conceptions and Science Education. Kiel, Germany: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education. Verfügbar unter: http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/ (Letzter Zugriff: 10.10.2017).
Garner, R.L (2006). Humor in pedagogy: How ha-ha can lead to aha! College Teaching, 54(1), 177-180.
Gooding, J. y Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change: Tips for identifying and overcoming students’ misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37.
Gropengießer, H. (2007). Theorie des erfahrungsbasierten Verstehens. Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung (pp. 105-116). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Gropengießer, H. y Marohn, A. (2018). Schülervorstellungen und Conceptual change. Theorein in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung (pp. 49-67). Berlin: Springer.
Halldén, O. (1999). Conceptual change and contextualization. En Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S. y Carretero, M. (Eds) New perspectives on conceptual change, p. 53-65. Amterdam: Pergamon.
Hardingham, G.E., y Bading, H. (2003). The yin and yang of NMDA receptor signaling. Trends in Neurosciences, 26 (2)358-362.
Krüger, D. (2007). Die Conceptual Change-Theorie. En: D. Krüger y H. Vogt (Hrsg.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung (pp. 81-92). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
Kuhn, T.S. (1976). Die Struktur wissenschaftlicher Revolution (2a ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago IL, London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., y Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lavados, J. (2012). Capítulo 1, 2 y 3. El cerebro y la educación, Neurobiología del aprendizaje (1a ed.). Santiago, Chile: Taurus Pensamiento.
Lee, G. y Byun, T. (2012). An explanation of the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: the relationship between cognitive conflict and responses. Research in Science Education, 42, 943-965.
Mednick, S., Nakayama, K., Cantero, J. L., Atienza, M., Levin, A. A., Pathak, N. y Stickgold, R. (2002). The restorative effect of naps on perceptual deterioration. Nature Neuroscience, 5 (7), 677-68 1.
Meltzoff, A.N., Kuhl, P.K., Movellan, J. y Sejnowski, T.J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284-288.
Parsons, C.G., Stoffler, A. y Danysz, W. (2007). Memantine: An NMDA receptor agonist that improves memory by restoration of homeostasis in the glutamatergic system - too little activation is bad, too much is even worse. Neuropharmacology, 53 (6), 699-723.
Pacual, R. (2012). Neuroplasticidad. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso. ISBN:978-956-17-0526-5.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W. y Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63 (2), 167-199.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W. y Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211–227.
Ranaweera, A. P. N. y Montplaisir, L. M. (2010). Students’ illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool. Anatomical Science Education, 3, 227–233.
Strike, K.A. y G.J. Posner (1992): A revisionist theory of conceptual change. En R. Duschl y R. Hamilton (Eds.), Phylosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp.147-176). New York: New York University Press.
Treagust, D.F. (1988) Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science, International Journal of Science Education, 10:2, 159-169.
Tsoory, M.M., Vouimba, R. M,. Akirav, I., Kavushansky. A., Avital, A. y Richter- Levin, G. (2008). Amygdala modulation of memory-related processes in the hippocampus: Potencial relevance to PTSD. Progress in Brain Research, 167,35-51.
Vosniadou, S. (2008). Conceptual change research: An introduction. In S. Vosniadou (Hrsg.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. xiii-xxviii). New York: Routledge.
Vosniadou, S. y Brewer, W. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51–67.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. y Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. En D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
Wanzer, M. B., Frymier, A. B. y Irwin, J. (2010). An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education, 59(1), 1-18.
Wesson, K. 2001. What recent brain research tells us about learning. Independent School 61 (1), 58–69.
Zull, J. (2002). The art of changing the brain. Sterling: Stylus Publishing LLC, USA.
Capítulo 3
¿Cómo incorporar las grandes ideas de la Ciencia a la práctica docente?: reflexiones desde el aula
Corina González-Weil6,3 y Paulina Bravo González1,78
Resumen
Existe una tendencia creciente a considerar las Grandes Ideas de la Ciencia como útiles para