Группа авторов

Management of Complications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery


Скачать книгу

however, there are no data to support continued antibiotic administration beyond the first 24 hours after surgery [12–14]. In relation to third molar surgery, 50% of infections are localized subperiosteal abscess‐type infections occurring approximately two to four weeks after surgery [10]. This type of infection is attributed to debris left under the surgically created mucoperiosteal flap and would likely not be prevented with the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. The remainder of third molar SSIs are rarely severe enough to necessitate further surgery or antibiotics. SSI occurring within the first postoperative week occurs only 0.5–1% of the time [10, 11, 15].

      The risk of developing an SSI associated with the removal of third molars increases with an increased degree of impaction, need for bone removal or sectioning of the tooth, the presence of gingivitis, periodontal disease, and/or pericoronitis, surgeon experience, increasing age, and antibiotic use. The benefit of systemic antibiotic administration on incidence of SSI in relation to third molar extractions is questionable and is not currently recommended as the incidence of adverse reactions from antibiotic administration is higher than the incidence of SSI, 11% and 0.8–4.2%, respectively [10, 11, 15]. It is also unlikely that perioperative systemic antibiotics are of any benefit in delayed, subperiosteal type, infections due to the nature of these infections as described previously [10].

Schematic illustration of a flow diagram depicting Surgical Site Infection.

       Bleeding/Hemorrhage

       Etiology: vessel injury, undiagnosed vascular malformation, patient risk factors

       Management: pressure and packing, vessel ligation, electrocautery, bone wax, topical hemostatic agents, interventional radiology

      The incidence of clinically significant bleeding as a result of third molar surgery ranges from 0.2% to 5.8% [4–6]. According to the AAOMS Age‐Related Third Molar Study, approximately 0.7% occur intraoperatively and 0.1% occur postoperatively [1]. Significant bleeding or hemorrhage is most often associated with mandibular third molar surgery (80%) when compared with maxillary third molar surgery (20%) [16]. Specific risk factors include advanced age, distoangular impactions, and deep impactions [6]. Massive intraoperative bleeding is a rare occurrence and is often attributed to the presence of an undiagnosed arteriovenous malformation (AVM) [16]. As such, examination of the surgical site for gingival discoloration, palpable thrill, or bruit is necessary. Imaging may demonstrate a multilocular radiolucency in the area of AVM. In these patients, angiography is essential to confirm diagnosis and treatment with embolization before the extraction is preferred.

      The most common inherited bleeding disorder, von Willebrand disease, affects an estimated 1% of individuals. Hemophilia A or B is present in 1 in 5000 live births. Depending upon patient age and sex, the first surgical procedure a patient undergoes may be third molar extraction, and patients with mild to moderate forms of certain coagulopathies may have gone undiagnosed previously. Patients with acquired or congenital coagulopathy will require further workup prior to surgery. Depending upon the specific condition, recent laboratory values, coagulation factor replacement, hematology consultation, or inpatient surgery and hematological management schemes may be necessary.

      Antithrombotic treatment with medications such as warfarin (Coumadin), clopidogrel (Plavix), and aspirin is commonly encountered among patients requiring extractions. Coumadin and Plavix rank among the top 100 prescribed medications in the United States, with an estimated 25% of individuals over age 75 currently on Coumadin, and according to the US Food and Drug Administration, over 100 billion aspirin pills are consumed each year. Most current literature does not recommend withholding these medications for uncomplicated tooth extraction. The risk of a thrombotic event outweighs any benefit of withholding the medication. In patients taking Coumadin, a preoperative INR (international normalized ratio) may be of value in assessing the current status of bleeding risk. According to Potoski, an INR value of 4.0 is acceptable for minor surgical procedures, an INR of 3.0 is preferred if the patient is also taking Plavix, aspirin, or another antiplatelet medication, and an INR of 2.5 is preferred for more involved or complex surgery where significant bleeding is anticipated [16].

Schematic illustration of a flow diagram depicting Hemorrhage.

       Mandibular Fracture

       Etiology: excessive and inappropriate force, patient risk factors

       Management: soft non‐chew diet, closed treatment, open reduction, and internal fixation