128 118
129 119
130 120
131 121
132 122
133 123
134 124
135 125
136 126
137 127
138 128
139 129
140 130
141 131
142 132
143 133
144 134
145 135
146 136
147 137
148 138
149 139
150 140
151 141
152 142
153 143
154 144
155 145
156 146
157 147
158 148
159 149
160 150
161 151
162 152
163 153
164 154
165 155
166 156
167 157
168 158
169 159
170 160
171 161
172 162
173 163
174 164
175 165
176 166
177 167
178 168
179 169
180 170
181 171
182 172
183 173
184 174
185 175
186 176
187 177
188 178
189 179
190 180
191 181
192 182
193 183
194 184
195 185
196 186
197 187
198 188
199 189
200 190
201 191
202 192
203 193
204 194
205 195
206 196
207 197
208 198
209 199
210 200
211 201
212 202
213 203
214 204
215 205
216 206
217 207
218 208
219 209
220 210
221 211
222 212
223 213
Preface (Including a Word to Instructors)
Most of the projects in this book were originally designed for undergraduate majors in anthropology, and they have been thoroughly tested over more than 20 years of teaching them. However, they may also be useful to anyone with an interest in qualitative methods, including postgraduate students in anthropology as well as researchers in related fields. Prior to the 1980s, there was precious little interest in teaching fieldwork methods to undergraduates, especially in the United States. There were some individual instructors who took it upon themselves to teach and supervise fieldwork projects, but no overall institutional expectation that undergraduates need be trained as fieldworkers, and, in fact, there was a significant contingent within the discipline that was actively hostile to the idea of undergraduates conducting fieldwork. There was not even a uniform interest in teaching field methods to doctoral candidates in those days. Eventually seminars and field schools, such as the one created by H. Russell Bernard, set about ensuring that professional fieldworkers had a solid methodological grounding before embarking on sustained fieldwork. Such seminars produced invaluable written resources for the novice fieldworker, and they continue to proliferate. These resources are, however, geared to a level of professionalism that is unnecessary for many undergraduate projects.
Undergraduate student needs are highly varied, but, no matter what their personal and professional goals in life are, they can all benefit from having some grounding in anthropological methods. While it is typical for a biology or chemistry course to have a lab component, it is less common for cultural anthropology courses to have a methods course. This is true for a number of reasons. First, anthropological fieldwork does not happen in a self-contained laboratory. Therefore, it is not easy to supervise. Second, fieldwork can take considerable amounts of time