Группа авторов

Second Language Pronunciation


Скачать книгу

No focus on PF outside of what teachers normally do (with particular features targeted) PFs proactively integrated into L/S instruction (with particular features targeted) Does the type of integration result in different outcomes? Integration of PFs is done as an add-on, with work on particular PFs as another activity among many (as in integrated skills textbooks). Integration of particular PFs is fully integrated into other parts of teaching. Is the teaching of PFs relevant to the overall topic more effective than teaching irrelevant PFs? Teach PFs that are largely irrelevant for topic (e.g., vowels for spoken fluency) Teach PFs that are relevant to topic (e.g., thought groups for spoken fluency) Does the integration of PFs into a reading class lead to better reading outcomes (e.g., for phonemic awareness)? Teach reading without addressing PFs Teach reading while addressing PFs Does the intensity of integration make a difference in outcomes? Integrate a modest amount each day during the term. Integrate intensively during the first several weeks, then as needed. What is the effect of explanation vs. practice? Integrate with explanation only in class. Practice via optional homework. (Variant: Explain with optional homework) Integrate with explanations and with class practice. (Variant: Explain with required homework) What is the effect of integrating different PFs into instruction? Integrate one or more PFs or aspects of PFs (e.g., Prominence signaling New information) Integrate other PFs (e.g., Prominence signaling contrasts)

      In this section, we examine two ways of integrating pronunciation into classes focused primarily on other skills. We do this first through the use of vignettes, in which teachers create their own non-textbook focused plan and second, through examples of how to connect pronunciation skills to published textbook materials. These two approaches provide distinct challenges. In the vignettes, teachers have tremendous flexibility about what is included in a lesson, but when following the pedagogy provided by textbooks (which an instructor often has not chosen), pronunciation connections often must be made by teachers without assistance from the textbook or teacher’s guide. In our examples, we have developed two vignettes showing how pronunciation can be integrated into different types of ABE classes. In the first vignette, we look at a literacy-level class, where basic literacy skills and vocabulary lessons are taught with a workplace focus. Vignette 2 involves a pre-CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) class with high intermediate and advanced English learners. In addition, we look at two examples of published materials (one for lower-level classes and one for higher level) to show where pronunciation can be relevant to other skills even when it is not included by the textbook authors.

      Vignette 1

      In this workplace-focused literacy-level class, the learners are newly arrived refugees from Southeast Asia, with native speakers of Burmese, Karen, Karenni, and Nepali. Approximately half are literate in their native languages that use non-Roman alphabets, and the other half have limited or no literacy skills. All learners have limited speaking and listening skills in English.

Activity with Integrated Pronunciation Literacy Skills Pronunciation Element
The teacher says each word as learners count the sounds on their fingers, segmenting each word into individual phonemes so that learners can clearly hear and count them (e.g., back has three sounds). The teacher distributes cards divided in three sections. Learners place a marker on the section where they hear the target sound (e.g., for Where is the /p/ in hip? the marker is placed on the final section. Where is the /h/ in hip? the marker is placed on the first section. Where is the /ɪ/ in hip? the marker is placed in the middle section). Phonemic Awareness: Phoneme Segmentation Phonemic Awareness: Phoneme Isolation Perception development of all sounds in target vocabulary with teacher feedback Auditory and Kinesthetic
The teacher says a body part and the learners write the last sound on mini-whiteboards, and hold it up for the teacher to see (e.g., for hand, the learners write d). The teacher engages learners in spelling the words on their mini-whiteboards, starting with the final sound and working forward. Phonemic Awareness: Phoneme Isolation and Phonics and Spelling Perception development of final sounds in target words with teacher feedback Auditory and Visual
The teacher introduces the question, “What’s wrong?” and the response, “I hurt my _____.” The teacher models how to emphasize the word hurt and the target body part, and minimize the words I and my, first by having the learners clap on the stressed words, then by having the them gesture on the emphasized words. The teacher then asks the class, “What’s wrong?” and holds up a picture. The class provides the prompted response; the teacher gives feedback as needed. Vocabulary development and speaking fluency Controlled production and practice of sentence stress with teacher feedback Kinesthetic, Auditory and Visual
Each learner receives a picture of a body part. Learners mingle and pair up; the first learner asks, “What’s wrong?” The second learner responds, “I hurt my ___,” saying the body part word indicated in their picture. The learners then switch roles. After the dialogue has been repeated, the learners trade pictures, then find a new partner. Speaking and listening fluency Extension of sentence stress production Auditory and Visual

      Opening the Lesson: The teacher introduces parts of the body using pictures, then leads the class through a Total Physical Response (TPR) activity; the teacher issues commands (e.g., Point to your leg. Point to your head.) and the learners listen and follow the instructions. The teacher then moves to activities that build both perception and production of final consonants in target vocabulary, with the repetition and the immediate feedback from the teacher and classmates helping learners commit accurate phonological representations of the words to their long-term memory. Additionally, the perception activities help learners develop their spelling ability for later writing activities; when asked to “sound it out,” they are more acutely aware that words are made up of individual sounds