Группа авторов

Handbook of Aggregation-Induced Emission, Volume 2


Скачать книгу

with an increasing concentration of F. This change was explained by the disruption of the existing six‐membered hydrogen bonding, involving the hydroxyl group and imine nitrogen, which allow the ESIPT process through deprotonation of the phenolic hydroxyl group. Excellent experimental results of detection limits and selectivity over other anions were also obtained in real sample detection (Figure 3.12f, g).

Image described by caption.

      Source: Panels (b) and (c) are reprinted from Ref. [34] (Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry).

      (d) Chemical structures of fluoride probes 22, 23, and 24. (e) The possible processes and mechanisms involved in the SSB probe with fluorine ions. (f) Linear relationship of 22 with the concentration of F ions. (g) Column diagrams of the fluorescence intensity of 22 with tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts at λmax 486 nm; red bars represent the addition of various anions to the blank solution, and black bars represent the subsequent addition of F (2 equiv.) to those respective solutions (22 + A + F).

      Source: Reprinted from Ref. [31] (Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V.).

Schematic illustration of the design rationale of the fluorescence turn-on detection of UO22+ based on AIE characteristics of 25.

      Source: Adapted with permission from Ref. [32] (Copyright 2014 Elsevier B.V.).

Schematic illustration of (a) the PPi detection mechanism of 26 copper(II) complex. (b) Fluorescent intensity response at 570 nm of 26 copper(II) complex with different anions in a 20% DMSO aqueous solution.

      Source: Reprinted from Ref. [39] (Copyright 2015 Royal Society of Chemistry).

Schematic illustration of cyclization reaction of 27 with Cys followed by hydrolysis to give the final SSB fluorophore.