Группа авторов

Ridley's The Vulva


Скачать книгу

disease.

      Another vital facet of multidisciplinary working relates to clinicopathological correlation, and working closely with the pathologist is essential. It is important that the clinical and histological diagnosis concur, and if there is doubt, biopsies may need to be repeated. Agreement and understanding of changing classifications and terminology must also occur between clinicians and pathologists to avoid confusion. It has been shown that cooperation between gynaecology and dermatology pathologists improves the accuracy of reporting of vulval biopsies [16].

      History

      The importance of an accurate and thorough history cannot be overemphasised. Many find it convenient to have a formal proforma as a basis for history taking, and to then enlarge upon particular aspects in the light of the individual patient’s problem. A structured form ensures that essential information is collected. It is also useful to have similar baseline data for each patient to be used for future comparative clinical research. Some clinicians advocate the use of pre‐clinic questionnaires where the patient can provide basic information which can then act as the basis for more detailed face‐to‐face questioning [17]. However, it is possible to be misled and easy to miss non‐verbal cues from the patient with this approach. It can be helpful to use validated questionnaires to give a quantifiable assessment of how the vulval problem affects quality of life. It is common for even mild vulval disease to have a severe impact on the patient [18], which can be overlooked in history taking. Several tools are available, but these are usually generic and not specific to the vulva [19]. A Vulval Disease Quality of Life Index in lichen sclerosus has recently been published [20]. The Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) [21], Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) [22], Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS) [23], and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [24] are frequently used in practice. In patients with pain, the McGill Pain Questionnaire [25] is most often used but several outcome measures are used in studies, which make results difficult to compare [26].

      It is important that the initial interview should take place in a relaxed and sympathetic atmosphere, as this is the first encounter with the patient. Building a good rapport at this stage will help them gain confidence in the consultation. If there are language difficulties which will impede good history taking, an interpreter is needed, but this can unfortunately limit the information that the patient is willing to give. A professional interpreter should always be used in order to ensure that you are receiving the correct information, which may not be given accurately by a family member. In the setting of a teaching clinic, it is essential to ensure that the patient is content to have a student or observer present before starting to take the history.

Supplementary questions
Presenting complaint Duration
Triggers/alleviating factors
Constant/intermittent
Associated features
Treatments used Prescribed/over the counter Duration of treatment Response to treatment
Past medical history Other medical issues
Autoimmune disease
Family history Atopy
Skin disease
Vulval disease
Autoimmune disease
Drug history Current drugs taken Allergies
Dermatological Other skin disease
Atopy
Hygiene practice Frequency Products used
Gynaecological Menarche Any delay in puberty
Cycle Relationship of symptoms to cycle
Menorrhagia
Vaginal discharge Type Colour Constant or intermittent
Contraception
Cervical cytology
HPV vaccination
Bleeding*
Dyspareunia Superficial or deep Recovery – minutes, hours, days
Obstetric Number of pregnancies Miscarriages, terminations
Mode of delivery Episiotomy/obstetric tears
Complications of delivery
Urinary Incontinence Stress/urgency Use of pads
Dysuria
Difficulty with stream
Gastrointestinal Diarrhoea/constipation