James A. Jahnke

Continuous Emission Monitoring


Скачать книгу

will not be able to make the 90° change in the direction to enter the space. If the end of such a sheath is partially closed off with a porous plate to provide for gas diffusion, the external filter probe can undergo a probe calibration check. Calibration gas can be injected into the sheath to flood out the stack gas during the calibration intervals.

      In filter assemblies mounted outside of the stack, a heater either can be fitted into the assembly or placed around the outside of the filter holder. This allows the hot flue gas sample to remain hot as it is drawn through the filter and passed through to the heated sample line and the remainder of the conditioning system. The principal advantage of this configuration is that the coarse filter can be easily unclamped and inspected. The entire probe assembly does not need to be unbolted and removed from the stack to replace the filter, and if the probe becomes plugged with particulate matter, the plug can be pushed out with a rod. Also, if the probe is mounted at an angle (Figure 3‐5), water or acid condensed in the probe can roll back into the stack.

Schematic illustrations of (a) a simple probe filter. (b) Sintered filter with a baffle plate deflector. (c) Sintered filter with a deflector sheath. Schematic illustration of a course filter assembly mounted outside of the stack.

      Other variations of the designs as shown in Figure 3‐5 are also used. One variation uses a coarse filter of 10–50 μm porosity at the probe tip, but incorporates a 1‐μm‐pore‐size external fine filter at the flange assembly. Another variant uses a bellows valve to close off the external filter from the probe to reduce the amount of gas necessary to perform a probe calibration check.

Schematic illustration of the inertial filter.

      Conceptually, this system may appear ideal, but actually, submicron sized particles (<1 μm diameter) can follow the radial sample flow and enter the tubular filter. These embedded particles can further assist in the filtering action to reduce the filter pore size and remove particles down to 0.5 μm diameter from the sample stream. However, this also means that the filter can eventually become plugged.

      Filter plugging can be a problem with any fully extractive system. Plugging can be minimized by “blowing back” on the filter using high‐pressure gas, plant air, or steam – air at pressures from 60 to 100 pounds per square inch (psi) is blown back through the filter, opposite to the normal direction of gas flow. The blowback can be pulsed by first pressurizing a surge tank and suddenly releasing the pressure to shock the particulate matter out of the pores of the filter. Depending upon particle characteristics and concentration, filters are blown back at periods of 15 minutes to 8 hours for durations of 5–10 s; 15‐minute blowback cycles are common. Care must be taken in the blowback system so that the blowback gas does not cool the probe to the extent that acids or other gases condense.

      Umbilical Line

Schematic illustration of an umbilical assembly external to the stack.

      In cool/dry extractive systems, heat‐traced line is used all the way from the probe to the moisture removal system. This distance can be as short as 2–3 ft for stack located systems, but is more commonly 100–250 ft. It is important to insulate and/or heat the junctions between the heat‐traced sample line and the probe and between the line and the moisture removal system; otherwise cold spots can develop that may eventually cause plugging and corrosion. If the moisture removal system is installed at the probe location, or if a dilution