Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 2018; 11:e000035.
4 4 Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Leonardi S et al. Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome (MATRIX): final 1‐year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2018; 392:835–848.
5 5 Neumann FJ, Sousa‐Uva M, Ahlsson A et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40:87–165.
6 6 Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. The Lancet 2011; 377:1409–1420.
7 7 Romagnoli E, Biondi‐Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE‐STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST‐Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60:2481–9.
8 8 Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis‐Holland JE et al. An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:e000035.
9 9 Lascarrou JB, Merdji H, Le Gouge A et al. Targeted Temperature Management for Cardiac Arrest with Nonshockable Rhythm. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:2327–2337.
10 10 Kotowycz MA, Dzavik V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5:127–33.
11 11 Sciahbasi A, Frigoli E, Sarandrea A et al. Radiation Exposure and Vascular Access in Acute Coronary Syndromes: The RAD‐Matrix Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:2530–2537.
12 12 Dandekar VK, Vidovich MI, Shroff AR. Complications of transradial catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2012; 13:39–50.
13 13 Shroff AR, Gulati R, Drachman DE et al. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 2020; 95:245–252.
14 14 Fernandez R, Zaky F, Ekmejian A, Curtis E, Lee A. Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91:1273–1280.
15 15 Shah RM, Patel D, Abbate A, Cowley MJ, Jovin IS. Comparison of transradial coronary procedures via right radial versus left radial artery approach: A meta‐analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 88:1027–1033.
16 16 Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention 2017; 13:851–857.
17 17 Michael TT, Alomar M, Papayannis A et al. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL‐CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:1138–44.
18 18 Tsigkas G, Makris A, Tsiafoutis I et al. The L‐RECORD Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:1014–1016.
19 19 Vefali V, Saricam E. The comparison of traditional radial access and novel distal radial access for cardiac catheterization. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019.
20 20 Liontou C, Kontopodis E, Oikonomidis N et al. Distal radial access: a review article. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2019.
21 21 Abdelaal E, Brousseau‐Provencher C, Montminy S et al. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:1129–37.
22 22 Shroff AR, Gulati R, Drachman DE et al. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 95:245–252.
23 23 Nguyen P, Makris A, Hennessy A et al. Standard versus ultrasound‐guided radial and femoral access in coronary angiography and intervention (SURF): a randomised controlled trial. EuroIntervention 2019; 15:e522–e530.
24 24 Pancholy SB, Sanghvi KA, Patel TM. Radial artery access technique evaluation trial: randomized comparison of Seldinger versus modified Seldinger technique for arterial access for transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 80:288–91.
25 25 Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E et al. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 2008; 95:410–415.
26 26 Rodriguez‐Niedenfuhr M, Vazquez T, Nearn L, Ferreira B, Parkin I, Sanudo JR. Variations of the arterial pattern in the upper limb revisited: a morphological and statistical study, with a review of the literature. J Anat 2001; 199:547–66.
27 27 Louvard Y, Lefevre T. Loops and transradial approach in coronary diagnosis and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51:250–2.
28 28 Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S et al. Working through complexities of radial and brachial vasculature during transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83:1074–88.
29 29 Patel T, Shah S, Pancholy S, Rao S, Bertrand OF, Kwan T. Balloon‐assisted tracking: a must‐know technique to overcome difficult anatomy during transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83:211–20.
30 30 Cha KS, Kim MH, Kim HJ. Prevalence and clinical predictors of severe tortuosity of right subclavian artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:1220–2.
31 31 Abhaichand RK, Louvard Y, Gobeil JF, Loubeyre C, Lefevre T, Morice MC. The problem of arteria lusoria in right transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 54:196–201.
32 32 Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P et al. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2016; 9:1419–1434.
33 33 Hadjivassiliou A, Cardarelli‐Leite L, Jalal S et al. Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020.
34 34 Rosencher J, Chaib A, Barbou F et al. How to limit radial artery spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions: The spasmolytic agents to avoid spasm during transradial percutaneous coronary interventions (SPASM3) study. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2014; 84:766–71.
35 35 Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M et al. Impact of length and hydrophilic coating of the introducer sheath on radial artery spasm during transradial coronary intervention: a randomized study. JACC Cardiovascular interventions 2010; 3:475–83.
36 36 Abe S, Meguro T, Endoh N et al. Response of the radial artery to three vasodilatory agents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 49:253–6.
37 37 Varenne O, Jegou A, Cohen R et al. Prevention of arterial spasm during percutaneous coronary interventions through radial artery: the SPASM study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68:231–5.
38 38 Curtis E, Fernandez R, Lee A. The effect of vasodilatory medications on radial artery spasm in patients undergoing transradial coronary artery procedures: a systematic review. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 2017; 15:1952–1967.
39 39 Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Raisakis K et al. Moderate procedural sedation and opioid analgesia during transradial coronary interventions to prevent spasm: a prospective randomized study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6:267–73.
40 40 Bertrand OF. Acute forearm muscle swelling post transradial catheterization and compartment syndrome: prevention is better than treatment! Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75:366–8.
41 41 Bertrand OF, Larose E, Rodés‐Cabau J et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of bleeding after transradial coronary stenting and maximal antiplatelet therapy. American heart journal