Группа авторов

Isotopic Constraints on Earth System Processes


Скачать книгу

in the diffusion couple experiments."/>

      2.2.2. Electron Microprobe Analyses

      Each diffusion couple was extracted and sectioned down its vertical axis, mounted in a 1‐inch epoxy puck, and polished to 0.25 μm. After mounting, we measured the length of the diffusion couples and note that each one had compressed from an initial length of 10.4 mm down to about 6.6 mm. Axis‐parallel major‐element diffusion profiles were measured from end‐to‐end with a JEOL JXA‐8200 SuperProbe at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory using a 15 nA beam current rastered at 12000× magnification (12 μm × 9 μm beam dimensions) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV. Sodium was measured first at each spot to mitigate effects of Na migration. All electron probe data are provided as an Excel file in the Electronic Supplement.

      2.2.3. Ca Isotopic Measurements

      After microprobe measurements, diffusion couples were sectioned into wafers, about 465 μm thick and weighing about 3 mg, using a Bico diamond wafer saw with blade thickness of 165 μm. The wafers were dissolved in a mixture of hydrofluoric and perchloric acid, dried at 165°C, redissolved in 5 mL 3N HNO3, aliquotted, mixed with a 42Ca‐48Ca double spike to correct for spectrometer‐induced mass discrimination (cf. Watkins, 2010), dried to a small bead, and the bead was redissolved in 100 μL 3N HNO3 for loading onto cation exchange columns. The Ca fraction was separated and collected by cation exchange chromotography using Eichrom Ca‐spec DGA resin. The non‐Ca fraction was saved for subsequent K isotope work. About 3 μg of purified Ca from each sample were loaded onto a zone‐refined Re filament, dried down, topped with 1 μL of 20% of H3PO4 acid and re‐dried.

      Ca isotopes were measured by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS) at UC‐Berkeley on a Thermo‐Finnegan Triton TI with nine moveable Faraday collectors. For each sample, at least 100 isotope ratio measurements were made to reduce within‐run uncertainties to ± 0.04‰. At the time these data were collected in 2009, the long‐term uncertainty in the standard (SRM 715) was conservatively estimated to be ± 0.15‰, and we use this value for the error bars. The Ca isotope ratios of the samples were determined using an iterative spike subtraction algorithm and are reported as (Skulan et al., 1997):

      (2.1)delta Superscript 44 Baseline upper C a comma per-mille equals left-parenthesis StartFraction Superscript 4 4 Baseline upper C a slash upper C a Over 0 period 0 2 1 2 0 7 6 EndFraction minus 1 right-parenthesis dot 1000 period

      2.2.4. K Isotopic Measurements

Sample Distance (mm) δ 44Ca n δ 41K n
RP2–1 0.33 0.70 2
RP2–2 0.99 0.46 5
RP2–3 1.65 0.15 4
RP2–4 2.31 –0.37 2
RP2–5 2.97 –0.77 2
RP2–6 3.62 –0.90 2
RP2–7 4.28 –1.26 2
RP2–8 4.94 –0.78 2
RP2–9 5.60 –0.78 2
RP2–10 6.26
RP3–1 0.33 –0.42 3