Enlightening Message. Serhij Abramyk

relationship with the Midianite priest, who was a Cushite, i.e., an Ethiopian, are fictional, they lead us to an understanding of where the yahwistic cult came from. (Exodus 2:15—22; Numbers 12:1; Amos 9:7) Ancient Judahite and Cushitic/Ethiopian tribes were certainly intermixed and shared vocabulary. Even in modern Ethiopian language of Oromo, the word “to fall” is translated as “jiga” or “jiguu”, which is quite a cognitive rendering of the Hebrew letters “YH” and the tetragrammaton “YHWH”, which, according to rabbinic tradition, should be pronounced Yah or Yahweh. It turns out that Judahites/Cushites adopted Yahweh from the Phoenitian/Philistine goddess Athirat (“erori” and “etorri” in Basque/Philistine also mean “to fall” and “to come”) and associated them together, as inscription from excavation in Kuntillet Arjud show. According to the Bible, Yahweh came from Sinai, Seir and mount Paran. Even the Egyptian sources mention the land around Sinai as “Shasu Yahu” after the appearance of the Philistines in the region. Semitic semi-nomad judges and messengers strongly condemned the worship of Athirat, who is translated in Judahite/Cushitic version as Yahweh. (Judges 3:7; Isaiah 17:8) Moses and others courageously fought against the worship of man-made gods. It was unthinkable for them that the exalted God would associate himself with the gods of the pagan peoples. However, the figurines of the standing woman supporting her breasts with her hands have been found in abundance within private dwelling compound at all major late-seventh century BCE in Judah. Unfortunately later, Jewish propaganda convinced everybody that the Phoenician lady is the God almighty of Moses.

      Left: Ancient Near East statue of the goddess. Right: Iberian lady from an unknown site in Murcia dated between the 4th—2nd centuries BCE

      The post-exilic stage of the editing of the Bible recapitulated many of the key themes of the earlier seventh-century stage. Once again a central authority needed to unite the population. And once again they did it by brilliantly reshaping the historical core of the Bible. The books of Jeremiah, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi are just spiritistic prophecies of the yahwistic occultists. The Enuma Elish, a Babylonian creation myth recorded in Akkadian on the seven clay tablets, contains numerous parallels to the passages of the Old Testament, which has led some researchers to conclude that these were based on the Mesopotamian work. Overarching similarities include: a reference to watery chaos before creation; separation of chaos into heaven and earth; different types of waters and their separation; as well as the numerical similarity between the seven tablets of the epic and the seven days of creation. As far as the creation of man is concerned, there are similarities in the use of dust or clay. In both, the dust is infused with “godhood”, either through a god’s blood in the Enuma Elish, or by being made in God’s image in Genesis. The rescue of the infant Moses from the water was copied from the Legend of Sargon, preserved in cuneiform inscription to this day. The enemy of the Judahite king David, Goliath, is said to have worn the armor of a 4th-century Greek warrior, which is an anachronism in seven centuries and, of course, hopeless falsification. Thanks to Egyptian sources, we know that the Philistine warriors were equipped only with leather protection at that time. (1 Samuel 17:4—7)

      With the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE and the rise of Christianity, the independent power of the Bible as a formative constitution proved itself. The colossal part of the so-called “New Testament” has direct analogies and similarities in the Talmud and Jewish apocryphal writings. Many Jesus’ teachings are in fact teachings of Pharisees and rabbis. For example, the saying “who takes a sword will perish from the sword” has the same analogy in the earlier Judean Book of Jubilees. (Matthew 26:52; The Book of Jubilees 4:31) The book of Revelation is not revelation at all, because it merely remakes the older spiritistic, apocalyptic visions of the books of Daniel, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, the Apocalypse of Zepheniah, 4. Book of Ezra, etc.

      Tales of Jesus’ healing at a distance in Matthew 8:5—13 or Luke 7:1—10 are based on other stories in the Talmud, which in turn are based on fictitious healings, allegedly performed by Elijah or Elisha. According to a story in the Talmud, rabbi Gamaliel’s son fell ill. He sent a deputation to rabbi Hanina ben Dosa, who prayed for the sick. The deputation wrote down the exact hour of that prayer, and upon their return, rabbi Gamaliel confirmed that at that moment the fever left his son, and he asked for water to drink. (Berakoth 34b) Rabbi Hanina ben Dosa was a member of the ancient Hasideans who performed such miracles through prayer. But the thaumaturgy is actually magic, and God does not help humans to do unnatural things. We can be sure that God’s messenger Jesus never used any sort of extraordinary power. God fights with the hands of a warrior, He heals with the hands of a physician. (Isaiah 35:10)

      The lies that Jesus cast out demons are based on the Testament of Solomon and the Jewish writings. Testament of Solomon contains many fabricated instances of communication with demons and exorcisms, as if performed by Solomon, which are similar to the stories in the canonical gospels. According to them, Solomon allegedly talked with demons and could command them. Demons are also called “legion” as those in gospel narratives. They were also terrified of the torment that Emmanuel would inflict upon them, similar to Jesus in canonical gospels. (Testament of Solomon 51,52; Matthew 8:28—34; Mark 5:1—21; Luke 8:26—40; compare Matthew 1:23) That such activities of Solomon were well known in the time of Jesus is confirmed by the Judean historian Flavius Josephus in his story about Eleazar who expelled the demon by sending him into the vessel, which is similar to the narrative in the canonical gospels and is only one more proof that the Pharisee-Christians were the ones who made up stories about Jesus. (The Antiquities of the Jews b.8, ch.2, p.5) Spiritism was forbidden by the law of Moses. (Deuteronomy 18:9—13) In fact, there is no such thing as a person’s permanent demonic possession. A person enters into some kind of connection only through expulsion or through other spiritistic activities, books, films, cards, amulets, etc., or through any religious activity, objects, images, etc. Further, many suffering from depression may have sought help from those who practice miracle cures. And, just during all these actions, convulsions, suffocation, voices, etc. can occur. Actually that’s all. A natural conclusion suggests itself that what is actually happening is related to the human psychology and physiology. According to the Gospel of Thomas, Jesus did not perform any miracles. He was even against fasting and public prayers. Therefore, spiritism should be forbidden for every person, and only then will every person be free from harmful influence. The New Godright Rights prohibit all religious and spiritistic acts and objects under the death sentence. (1 Samuel 28:3)