natural. If you shout "help" in the forest, nobody but a human being will understand you. That is, the sound you make, having found a shelter in another brain, will cause a reaction corresponding to its meaning. Now for the interesting part. What I was talking about, we're going to connect everything. We took all these theories of probability and hypotheses; like the same Einstein, we did not begin to understand especially and decided – there are worlds, and exact copies of them. We recorded billions of brain impulses, practically every thought, put them into a matrix, converted them and sent them into space by the influence of one particle on another to find their doppelgangers. After all, we, our brain, the whole planet and the whole galaxy, as well as everything else, constantly emit radiation, including these particles. So the whole universe is a broth of entangled pairs. Now, I should clarify here. When the influence of one particle on another is tested, it is done by holding them in the collider magnets so that we can observe and understand that influence. When we send the influence on the particles that make up our thought, the thought signal, we send as if at random, into space. If there is something like that out there, they will find each other. It's such a property, just like radio waves. Think of the same example with radio. If you send a signal, it is like the first part, and what catches it there and understands what that signal means is the second part. If they are strangers to each other, there will be no connection. Let's say you send one kind of radio waves, for example, KV, and there the receiver can only receive VHF. It seems to be close, but there will be no connection. But SOS signals, for example, are sent not specifically somewhere, but into the air. They find their target. Why? Because their target can be recognized, understood. Agree, you are not surprised that there is air around us, and its main component is nitrogen. There's a popular belief that air is made up of oxygen. It's only 23 percent oxygen. Perhaps there is a mass of something unknown around, carrying information about other worlds, but we do not understand it. We simply do not have the senses to perceive such things. For example, dolphins, having unique properties of signal communication, are completely deaf. Not only can't they hear us, they can't even imagine the existence of this kind of communication. Even if they developed the ability to understand human speech, they would need some kind of technical device to convert our speech into signals they could understand. Perhaps there is a world around us that is inaudible to us. After all, it's no secret that there is a limited range of human audible waves. And what is far to go. The same radio waves without a special device for us do not exist. So I thought that perhaps the kind of communication that other worlds use is simply unknown to us as a species. You're not surprised that we live in an ocean of all kinds of waves. Radio waves alone, that is, the ones that man has created, how many. We are not surprised that the universe is stitched with gravity, radiation. It was once thought to be filled with ether. And that made sense. The assumption was that sound waves bounce around material things like bumps and reach our ears. We thought that light should bounce on something. But it turned out to be the other way around. Light, on the contrary, needs as clean, empty space as possible. So it moves faster. Sound can't. That's why space is deaf. But radio waves, transmitting the same sound, can move like light and overcome obstacles. It doesn't surprise us that after all this, they turn into words we can understand. They're translated into that form. And the corresponding apparatus catches them. So why can't consciousness be brought into such a form that it can be transferred as a state of these particles and then converted into the same consciousness? The question remains: how will they get into another body or brain and replace consciousness there? Now remember hypnosis. You are given an order and you follow it. And now think why some people make you nervous, even if they don't speak. Why do full moons and natural phenomena affect the nervous system? Have you thought about it? Now I'll tell you if you know… well, of course you do, you just haven't paid much attention to it. I'm talking about radiation from living organisms. The same waves emitted by the brain. If you're talking, you're somehow also receiving what other people are saying. Simply put, if your brain emits radiation, you also receive radiation. If your brain receives information from your eyes and ears, it's fine if it receives invisible inaudible information. You just have to make it dominant. So that it can overcome the natural state and replace what is there with itself. That's what we've accomplished by finding the code for this effect. And now we will conduct the experiment itself, and you will not only see everything with your own eyes, but also take part in it.
Childish smiles appeared on the faces of most of the people in the group, though they themselves were not only at a high and responsible status, but also a level of intelligence.
Rutra, of course, did not personally make such decisions related to the demonstration of the method. Therefore, if there were any representatives of science in the group, they were members of political or administrative-managerial structures, mainly of a closed subdivision of the UN Security Council. The decision on declassification, public demonstration of the method was made by him after a conversation with Parmen, a month before.
And it went like this.
Chapter 2: Testing the Future
– Buddy, why don't we see what happens tomorrow?
When the "luminary of science" began in such a manner, which was expressed in the suggestion of something uninteresting, illogical and even stupid, Rutra immediately realized that he was up to something grandiose.
– We'll sleep tonight and see what happens tomorrow," Ruthra replied in the same manner.
– Then think about our role in the life of other worlds.
– And how have we affected these worlds?
– So that's something that needs to be checked out.
– And how's that?
– I thought you were smarter than that.
– You shouldn't have thought so.
They laughed. Many people, listening to their conversation from the outside, took their remarks seriously, which puzzled them about their relationship: it seemed that they were almost enemies, when in fact they were amusing themselves by arousing the emotions of others.
Rutra even had a peculiar theory about this kind of catching pleasure from influencing the emo ts y of those around him. This theory was part of his worldview about metaphysics. And the essence of it was people's uncertainty about understanding god, namely, what god needs from us. According to the logic that people put into the concept of god, it would be reasonable to assume that god doesn't need people at all. And if he created them, it means that he pursued some purpose. Everyone explained this purpose in his own way, starting from sages, thinkers and ending with charlatans and swindlers. Much more there were, of course, self-confident, and sometimes autocrats, fantasists. And it was a blessing if they did not have a sick imagination.
Rutra answered such a question as follows: since god is not material, he does not need material things. And since we have to give him immaterial things, the god, from whom we ask anything for our happiness, demands happiness back, but already processed, born from his seed, the happiness he gave us. And if you did not give him back anything good, spoiled what he gave, lost it, and suddenly – what is worse – turned it into grief, then accept his anger as education. This is the unity and struggle of opposites. But are they opposites? Perhaps it is something that creates the world. After all, agree, a world with only grief and negativity must eventually die. It is logical that the developed worlds, of which there are many in the universe according to Rutra's theory, have passed this stage. The stage of creating negativity from negativity. Blood feuds must stop at some point, or everyone will die at some point. In the other interpretation, however, there can be no intelligent god. God is something amorphous on which the entire universe depends. For example, one part of it is the law of universal gravitation. And according to this theory, reason again rests on the same truth. Since we can evolve by becoming better than each other, we become worse by killing. Simple logic, but isn't don't kill, don't steal complex logic? Isn't everything in this logical paradigm? For those who believe in the spiritual essence of god, we give him our positive emotions. And for those who believe in logic based on empirical reasoning – some super civilization is harvesting the energy, our brain waves, that we emit during euphoria – of happiness, of pleasure. Now think about it. If we become a supercivilization, if we can move through the worlds with the help of the