based on the crisis year of 1998.
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «Литрес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на Литрес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.
Примечания
1
In 1990, the World Bank began to publish a special periodical bulletin “Transition” in several languages, designed to highlight the experience and problems of radical economic reforms in countries with economies in transition.
2
Lyubimtseva S. V. Transformation of Economic Systems. Moscow, Economist Publ., 2003; Minaker P. A. Systemic transformations in the economy. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 2001; Monakhova L. I. Transformation of the Planned Economy into the Market Economy in the Context of Globalization. Moscow, Economist Publ., 2003; Olsevich Y. Transformation of economic systems. Moscow, Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1994.
3
Toffler A. Metamorphoses of Power. Moscow, AST Publishing House, 2002. P. 16.
4
Ekspert. 2002. No. 17. P. 65.
5
World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World – Transforming Institutions, Growth, and Quality of Life. Moscow, Ves Mir Publ., 2003. P. 2—3.
6
The use of the concept of “countries with economies in transition” in relation to the periods before 1990 is very conditional and is permissible only in view of the subsequent transformation processes in the socialist countries. According to the IMF methodology, the transition economies usually include the republics of the former USSR and Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Romania, the Czech Republic, and Mongolia.
7
Moiseyev N. N. How far until tomorrow… Free thoughts. 1917—1993. Moscow, MNEPU Publ., 1997. P. 251.
8
Toffler A. Op. cit., pp. 30—38.
9
Kuzyk B. N., Yakovets Y. V. Russia—2050: Strategy of Innovative Breakthrough. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2004. P. 45.
10
Abalkin L. I. Russia. Search for Self-Determination. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2002; Bogomolov O. T. My Chronicle of the Transition Time. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2000; Lukinov I. I. Evolution of Economic Systems. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2002; Medvedev V. A. Facing the Challenges of Post-Industrialism: A Look at the Past and Future of the Russian Economy. Moscow, Alpina Publisher Publ., 2003; The Way to the XXI Century: Strategic Problems and Prospects of the Russian Economy. Author. Coll. D. S. Lvov. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1999; Fedorenko N. P. Russia: Lessons of the Past and Faces of the Future. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 2000 and others.
11
Reforms through the Eyes of American and Russian Scientists. O.T. Bogomolov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1996; Stiglitz J. E. Globalization and Its Discontents / Transl. from English and note. G. G. Pirogov. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 2003.
12
Silvestrov S. On the Global Modernization of the World Order (Theses) // Society and Economy. 2004. No. 3. P. 8.
13
Coase R. The Firm, the Market, and the Law. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988. Р. 115, 158.
14
Economic Issues. 2002. No. 3. Pp. 138—141.
15
Statistical data of the Committee for Assistance to the Development of the ECOS. Public Administration in Transition Economies. Open Society Institute. Spring 2002. P. 3.
16
Currency Rain Dried Up the Polish Economy // Rossiyskaya Biznes-Gazeta. 2001. 20 March.
17
The National Economy of the USSR for 70 Years. Moscow, Finance and Statistics Publ., 1987. P. 13.
18
Kushlin V. I. Scientific and Technical Revolution in the USSR: History and Modernity / History of the USSR. 1988. No. 5. Pp. 11—12.
19
Kushlin V. I. The Production Apparatus of the Future: (Problems of Efficiency). Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1981.
Примечания
1
In 1990, the World Bank began to publish a special periodical bulletin “
2
3
4
Ekspert. 2002. No. 17. P. 65.
5
World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World – Transforming Institutions, Growth, and Quality of Life. Moscow, Ves Mir Publ., 2003. P. 2—3.
6
The use of the concept of “countries with economies in transition” in relation to the periods before 1990 is very conditional and is permissible only in view of the subsequent transformation processes in the socialist countries. According to the IMF methodology, the transition economies usually include the republics of the former USSR and Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Romania, the Czech Republic, and Mongolia.
7