albeit preliminary and roughly, but this happens quickly, in parallel and asynchronously. For some time, albeit a very short time, we unable to establish “what kind of objects these are?”;
The time required to establish clarity is different for each object. Depending on the content – some objects are interpreted almost instantly, while others literally manifest themselves, slowly filling with essence, definition, the necessary semantic clarity;
Also, “forgotten” objects are interpreted slowly, which are realized, i.e. contemplated and required for use very rarely, or extremely changed to the level of “difficult to recognize.” For example, it is difficult to identify a person whom you have not met for 30—40 years or more, and then encountered him “face to face”;
*Realization – as a still moment, implies a “frame of reality” (similar to a screenshot from a monitor screen), that is, a recorded situation, in the form of a contemplated picture. But, the realization observed “in the process” – is literally a phenomenon reflecting the transformation of existing experience into new experience. If we look at the process from the “Global Position”, then this happens only for the purpose of developing the “Entity” by acquiring new experience – mental, psychic, or any other, but necessarily new, and more rational and effective. The situations being realized are multi-component, but do not contain useless details. By analyzing each object and any situation, one can endlessly extract new experience;
Let us also take into account that with a lack of light, the quality of the situation (reality frame) is reduced and, in complete darkness, the image disappears completely. With eyes closed, being in the dark, a person does not see anything with the naked eye, i.e. in a normal state. Interpretation of objects, in low light, will be slow as with a lack of data, or with a limitation of the “channel width’. In late twilight, the time for recognizing objects increases, and we often encounter this incident: “look closer’ :);
To have a complete picture it is necessary to study in detail the mechanism of contemplation. The eye is an instrument similar to an optical device with “sensor cells” capable of responding to photons, but are they external? <objects, and photons>.
fig. 1
The cone cells of the eye, “when exposed to photons’, send corresponding electrical signals to the brain. Then, the signals are processed and the result of the processing is realized in a real picture, and simultaneously contemplated, after which we say “I” see. Focusing our vision on the point of concentration – “I” clearly see a specific object, and vaguely see the rest, the surrounding;
This is important: Pay special attention to the moment of impact of photons on the eye cell – at this moment photons cross the boundary of the body, and then everything that happens is implied by internal processes (first and initially we think like this: signals do not fly back, everything happens inside). The body is realized in the idea of “I Am – here, and this is how I look.” Look in the mirror – this is how you realize yourself, or to be more precise – “I” realizes itself in accordance with the existing experience. After crossing the body boundary, through the eyes and cone cells, the signals enter the brain, where they are processed and the “I” sees what is being contemplated. That is, it is You who now see what you previously considered independent of Consciousness*, and namely – external. Look around and look around – this is what is being contemplated now. This moment is extremely important in our research. Concentrate and analyze how this transition “inside the Self” occurs (and, does it occur?);
For a sure understanding, try again and again to recognize This “I” in reasoning – “Your Own Self”. When we reason about “I”, then each one should mean “Himself”. We can especially concentrate and also assume the “I” of each person, both from our own and from his position, abstractly, perceiving the picture from the outside, being an observer;
In the structure of the mechanism of contemplation, everything is very clear and there is nothing new. Science confirms the same, and today it is an objective scheme. But, the “angle” from which this scheme must be looked at has a special significance (we will try to look at it completely differently);
*Consciousness (in this study) – has a different meaning than the usual, generally accepted in philosophy, science, and modern literature. In the process of studying, we will move together to explain this concept, for an adequate understanding of the essence;
So, we will try look at it in a completely different way – in a new way. We propose to simplify the “Contemplation Mechanism Scheme” to the limit: Photons are reflected from objects, affecting the cells of the retina. The cells initiate signals and send them to the brain. After which these signals are processed and then we state “I see”. Study carefully and imagine this scheme as vividly as possible. The mechanism of contemplation is trivial and having realized it, we will be able to move to another level. Having delved into the reasoning, we will have to concentrate and be more attentive;
The signal handler (see fig. 1) irresistibly isolates and separates the elements in this reasoning:
object -> [f-cell-e] -> handler -> contemplated
The [f-cell-e] + handler (photon-cell-electron + handler) block – irresistibly and irreversibly separates external objects from internal processes, that is, we contemplate inside without the possibility of looking outside. In addition, the “handler” reliably destroys the previous format (…if it existed), converting it in some way unknown to us into what we call the contemplated – the visible, which cannot be outside;
We understand the essence of the insurmountability of systemic barriers and the irreversibility of processes, and we understand that we cannot see anything “external” directly, but how then do we “manage” to think about the external, being in conditions of complete isolation? Many researchers in this audience are absolutely sure that using the eyes, external objects are transmitted (!) to the brain by means of photons, and we see them inside, but contemplated and “physical”, they are definitely outside, … they think exactly this way and even say that “we do not see the objects themselves” – implying their existence as independent and external (this retro-conception is very familiar to us);
Knowing the structure, this is “nonsense’, although the main problem is precisely that the simplest thing turns out to be extremely difficult to understand, so only methodical repetition and periodic return to this structure will help us, that is, explaining it in other (and different) words, and looking from different positions. Let us take into account that it is not only the handler that turns out to be an obstacle, but there are also other obstacles, for example photons – they act only as a carrier of information, and are not the contemplated object itself (and only for now this is exactly the case); the eye cell receives photons, but sends an electrical signal to the brain processor (handler); we especially note that – the result of processing is not contemplated, in the conscious sense;
Contemplation of images (“things’, objects, and situations) is a psychic phenomenon inherent in the alive “Entity”;
You may substitute the term “Entity” for “Monad” or “Soul” – especially when it comes to the activity of the “I” in the conditions of reality, but we will deliberately refrain in order to avoid misinterpretations (we will soon study this concept) – do not rush to call the cup the “Grail’;
Of course, we understand very well that this is happening to us right now and, looking at the diagram, we can clearly imagine how: “I” is in a kind of spacious internal bubble, i.e. “I Myself’ (from the position of each of us, now), as if bathing in reality;
Here & now, all of us, being