Грамматические трудности перевода. Английский язык для юристов. Нина Владимировна Огнева

alike have to consider the legal implications of the torts they may face should their products injure a customer.

      11. The Supply of Goods and Services Act implies that services be provided with reasonable care, at a reasonable cost and within a reasonable time.

      12. The laws of certain countries require that parties to contracts should expressly accept arbitration clauses.

      13. I t is highly advisable that a negotiating lawyer should keep notes of all discussions and emails regarding the matter under negotiation.

      14. For a teacher of legal English it is important that he and his students should accept the fact that he cannot be an expert on all aspects of law in the students’ jurisdictions.

      15. It is recommended that you should conduct an Internet search for legal expressions together with the name of the jurisdictions.

      Conscience is the inner voice that warns us

      that someone might be looking.

      H. L. Mencken

      14. Модальные глаголы May, Must, выражающие предположение, уверенность

      MODELS

      May / might

      You may (might) have read his account of the case.

      Вы, возможно (может быть), читали его отчет об этом деле.

      Must

      The parties concerned must have stopped debating the claim. Заинтересованные стороны, очевидно (должно быть), прекратили обсуждение иска.

      1. Economists say that inflation might double and even treble in the near future.

      2. This politician used to be known as a tough old guy and people must have had reasons to think so.

      3. The Prime Minister mentioned that a more radical stand on the issue must have enabled his party to avoid defeat.

      4. Individual companies might have been more efficient if they had been liberated from central management.

      5. Without a constructive means of tackling disputes among WTO member countries, some of them might have led to a serious political conflict.

      6. Both sides in the cause must have grasped that they were living on “only one earth”.

      7. The court can never know exactly what was in the head of a criminal at the time of committing the crime, so it has the difficult task of deciding what his intentions must have been.