Нации и этничность в гуманитарных науках. Этнические, протонациональные и национальные нарративы. Формирование и репрезентация
Л. Н. Древние тюрки. М., 2003. С. 108.
33
Pritsak О. Karachanidische Streitfrage // Oriens. Vol. 3. N. 2.1950. S. 41.
34
Камалов А. К. Древние уйгуры VIII–IX вв. СПб., 2001. С. 61–70.
35
Lui Mau-tsai. Die chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Turken (T' u-kue), Wiesbaden, 1958. S. 66–71.
36
Зуев Ю. А. Создание Тюргешского каганата: история и традиция // Эволюция государственности Казахстана. Алматы, 1996. С. 39–48.
37
Виденгрен Гео. Мани и манихейство./ пер. с нем. С. В. Иванова. СПб., 2001. С. 41–47.
38
Бартольд В. В. Киргизы. Исторический очерк // Соч., Т. II. 4.1. М., 1963. С. 34, 78.
39
Otto of Freising. Chronica sive historia de duabus civitatibus, ed. A. Hofmeister, MGH SRG in usum scholarum separatim editi 45. Hannover, 1912. P. 6–9.
40
Ibid. P. 56–57.
41
Otto of Freising, Chronica sivé historia… P. 65–67 et passim.
42
Ibid. P. 99–100.
43
Ibid. P. 141–143.
44
Ibid. P. 180–192.
45
Ibid. P. 218–237.
46
Ibid. P. 244–258.
47
Ibid. P. 262–285.
48
Otto of Freising. Chronica sivé historia… P. 290–291.
49
C. Mierow (ed. and trans.). The Deeds of Frederick Barbarossa. New York, 1966. P. 3–4.
50
Otto of Freising. ‘Ottonis Gesta Friderici I. imperatoris’, in Georg Waitz and Bernhard von Simson (eds.), MGH SRG in usum scholarum separatim editi 46, Ottonis et Rahewini Gesta Friderici I. imperatori. Hannover, 1912. P. 1–161, atp. 136–139; Rahewin of Freising. ‘Rahewini Gesta Friderici I. imperatoris’, in Georg Waitz and Bernhard von Simson (eds.), MGH SRG in usum scholarum separatim editi 46. Ottonis et Rahewini. Gesta Friderici I. imperatoris. Hannover, 1912. P. 162–346, at p. 202–204.
51
Otto of Freising. ‘Gesta Friderici’. P. 44–47,135–139.
52
Rahewin of Freising. ‘Gesta Friderici’. P. 172–179.
53
Otto Mořena. ‘Ottonis Morenae eiusdemque continuatorum Libellus de rebus a Frederico imperatore gestis’, in F.-J. Schmale (ed. and trans.), Italische Quellen iiber die Taten Kaiser Friedrichs I. in Italien und der Brief iiber den Kreuzzug Kaiser Friedrichs I. Darmstadt, 1986. P. 34–239, at s. 60–62.
54
Anonymus. Carmen de gestis Frederici I. imperatoris in Lombardia, ed. I. Schmale-Ott, MGH SRG 62. Hannover, 1965. P. 3, 23.
55
Rahewin of Freising. ‘Gesta Friderici’. P. 187–188.
56
Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Pantheon’, in Georg Heinrich Pertz and Georg Waitz (eds.), MGH SS 22, Historici Germaniae saec. XII, 2. Hannover, 1872. P. 107–307, atp. 221–222.
57
/. Dendorfer. ‘Konrad III. und Byzanz’, in K.-H. Ruefi (ed.), Die Staufer und Byzanz. Góppingen, 2013. P. 58–73, at p. 68–69; K. Gorich. ‘Friedrich Barbarossa und Byzanz’, in K.-H. Ruefi (ed.), Die Staufer und Byzanz. Góppingen, 2013. P. 74–85, at p. 75.
58
K. Gorich. Friedrich Barbarossa: Eine Biographie. Munich, 2011. P. 56, 90-110.
59
Ibid. P. 418–424.
60
F. Hausmann. ‘Gottfried von Viterbo: Kapellan und Notar, Magister, Geschichtsschreiber und Dichter’, in A. Haverkamp (ed.), Friedrich Barbarossa. Handlungsspielráume und Wirkungsweisen des staufischen Kaisers. Sigmaringen, 1992. P. 603–621, atp. 605-68, 614–615.
61
Otto of Freising. ‘Gesta Friderici’. P. 103.
62
Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Speculum regum’, in Georg Heinrich Pertz and Georg Waitz (edd.), MGH SS 22, Historici Germaniae saec. XII, 2. Hannover, 1872. S. 21–93, at p. 68–69.
63
Ibid. P. 80–81; Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Pantheon’. P. 175.
64
Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Pantheon’. P. 175–177.
65
Ibid. P. 156–157.
66
Ibid. P. 201–202.
67
Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Speculum regum’, p. 90–91; Godfrey of Viterbo, ‘Pantheon’. P. 205.
68
Godfrey of Viterbo. ‘Pantheon’. P. 206–207.
69
Ibid. P. 225.
70
O. Engels. ‘Friedrich Barbarossa im Urteil seiner Zeitgenossen’, in O. Engels (ed.), Stauferstudien. Stuttgart, 1996. P. 225–245, atp. 243.
71
E. Miiller-Mertens. Regnum