of ownership associated with storage. This approach aims to reduce both CapEx and OpEx costs by reducing hardware to its bare commodity components, and removing secret source software from the controllers, in favor of placing it onto a common storage software layer provided by either the hypervisor or a software-defined storage model.
In the past, several attempts have been made to develop a common management system that can transcend storage hardware and software vendors. For example, the Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) developed the Storage Management Initiative Specification (SMI-S), and the World Wide Web Consortium has Representational State Transfer (REST). However, these have seen only limited adoption by the storage industry. To achieve even limited interoperability and provide a sense of single point of management and support, the only real option for large enterprise IT organizations and cloud service providers has been to deploy homogeneous storage islands from a single hardware vendor in an attempt to manage operational overhead and therefore reduce OpEx costs.
The theory behind the software-defined storage model is to facilitate management across a common plane, by breaking down the barriers to interoperability that exist with proprietary vendor storage hardware. For most IT organizations, storage from different vendors, or even different models of storage array hardware from the same vendor, create isolated storage islands. It can be difficult to interoperate, share resources, or even manage across these islands from a single pane of glass.
The software-defined storage model aims to provide OpEx cost savings by driving efficient capacity utilization and platform management in a more agile way, typically by providing automation and a common management interface for all of the storage infrastructure. Therefore, the challenge for enterprise IT organizations and cloud service providers is to find the right software-defined storage solution, one that can apply the right centralized software services to the entire infrastructure by using simple, unified operational procedures within a common user interface.
The software-defined storage model also aims to reduce CapEx costs by moving away from proprietary storage hardware, and toward technology that facilitates unified management across all components of the storage infrastructure. When considering hardware solutions to deliver a software-defined storage-based environment, IT executives may be focused on reducing the total cost of ownership of storage resources. The following list provides a buyer’s guide that IT organizations can use when working with their respective storage vendors to establish core storage requirements:
• Which storage solutions can work with the applications, hypervisors, and data that we currently have and are predicting to have going forward?
• Which storage solutions can enhance application performance?
• Which storage solutions best provide the required data availability?
• Which storage solutions can be deployed, configured, and managed quickly and effectively using currently available skills?
• Which storage solutions can provide greater, and if possible, optimal, storage capacity?
• Which storage solutions can best facilitate flexibility (provide the ability to add capacity or performance in the future without impacting the applications)?
• Which storage solutions provide automation and centralized management capabilities?
• Which storage technology will meet the preceding requirements within the available budget?
The approach often taken by IT organizations is to follow the lead of a trusted storage vendor. However, a key challenge for IT decision makers is to see beyond current trends in the industry and to arrive at a strategy that will provide a solution meeting not only today’s storage requirements at an acceptable level of cost, but also next year’s requirements for the various lines of business, and even the next decade’s. This requires a subjective and clear-headed evaluation of the options, their costs, and the alternative approaches that could deliver the required storage functionality that optimizes both CapEx and OpEx budgets.
An additional challenge, which you also shouldn’t overlook, is the complication associated with educating decision makers about the intricacies of storage technologies, in order to obtain budgetary approval. Enterprise IT executives rarely question the requirement to store and retain their ever-growing volume of business data. However, explaining the differences between various storage products, and their advantages and drawbacks, often requires a transfer of technical knowledge in order for the decision makers to grasp the concepts and challenges faced by the architect, and how they relate to their storage platform design.
When finances are stretched, as they so often are, a high storage infrastructure expenditure can significantly stand out on an IT executive’s annual budget spreadsheet. By examining the storage environment and calculating the total cost of ownership of storage resources, IT organizations can seek to identify new and innovative ways to address CapEx and OpEx expenditures through the software-defined storage model, without compromising application performance, capacity, availability or other data-related services.
Software-Defined Storage Summary
Just as VMware introduced x86 server virtualization to improve the cost metrics and utilization efficiencies of the compute platform, so too can the software-defined storage model be used to make the most efficient use of storage infrastructure, thereby reducing the total cost of ownership through storage acquisition and operational cost savings.
In the software-defined storage data center, all storage – whether it is directly attached hyper-converged Virtual SAN, or is SAN attached and leveraging Virtual Volumes–enabled arrays – can be used as part of a storage resource pool. This eliminates the requirement to rip and replace all of the storage infrastructure in order to adopt a fully hyper-converged unified storage model as part of a single migration project, and allows the IT organization to spread the costs associated with a full storage infrastructure refresh over a number of years.
This is only one storage strategy. Equally valid is the mixed hybrid approach of employing Virtual Volumes and Virtual SAN as a long-term design, effectively using both solutions for specific use cases and workloads, as illustrated in Figure 1.10.
Figure 1.10 Hybrid Virtual Volumes and Virtual SAN platform
Just like the classic storage model, large enterprise customers and cloud service providers that are adopting software-defined storage typically should configure resources into pools. Each pool is composed of a different set of characteristics and services.
For instance, a Virtual SAN tier 1 pool may be optimized for performance and business-critical workloads, while a tier 0 pool may comprise all-flash disk groups and provide storage resources to specific I/O-intensive workloads. Following a similar model, high-capacity, low-cost, low-performance disks may be fashioned into a pool intended for the data that is infrequently accessed or updated. With this type of approach to storage provisioning, the software-defined storage model will continue to enable the implementation of a tiered storage strategy in order to provide improved capacity utilization and resource efficiency.
Furthermore, the implementation of a software-defined storage model allows technologies such as thin provisioning, compression, and de-duplication to be applied across an entire storage platform, rather than isolating these features behind specific hardware controllers. This helps to ensure that storage capacity can be used more efficiently, via a global storage policy.
These technologies can help slow the rate at which new capacity must be added to the infrastructure, and help ensure that where appropriate, less-expensive hardware can be deployed. In addition, centralizing this functionality through a single control plane enhances ease of administration, which in turn can also help reduce operational costs and the efforts associated with software maintenance.
The software-defined storage model is not an industry standard, and various approaches exist for the design, implementation, and function of the solution stack. Both VMware and independent software vendors (ISVs) have in recent years developed the concepts and product architecture