rely for their real work: the term for lectures & discussion, the Vacations, and especially the ‘Long’ for steady reading. I think your universities suffer from not having it. Mine, this year, will be v. busy indeed, and no question of holidays to America.
But don’t think I am the less touched or grateful for your most kind offer of hospitality. I am speaking of the ‘Long’ as it has now come to be: of course originally this prolonged summer gap in all our English institutions–Parliament, Law courts, etc—dates, no doubt, from the days when we were an agricultural community and no one cd., at that time of the year, be spared from the land.
I have written to Genia. Your news is v. good. In a way it is [a] good sign, isn’t it?, that the Rector shd. not be a person she particularly likes. I will indeed continue my prayers for her. With love to all.
Yours
C. S. Lewis
TO HELEN D. CALKINS (W):42 TS
REE 52/123.
Magdalen College,
Oxford. 1st March 1952.
Dear Mrs. Calkins,
I will read it with pleasure,43 but I must’nt write a foreword. I have done far too many of them. It begins to make both the authors and me ridiculous, and also I run dry. I wish the book all success.
Yours sincerely,
C. S. Lewis
TO THE ROYAL LITERARY FUND (BOD):
Magdalen College,
Oxford 7/3/52
Sir
I write in support of an application which, I understand, my very deeply respected friend Mr. J. A. Chapman44 is making to your Committee. Mr. Chapman has in his old age a serious devotion both to his art and to humanity which we usually meet only in the young; if he has spent on the publication of his poem45 a sum very serious to him, though not large, I trust, by the standards of the R.L.E, I am sure he has been moved to do so not by an author’s vanity but by a sense of his mission. A grant to him would be a proper recognition of a long and arduous life devoted to letters and learning in a spirit of self-dedication.
I am, Sir,
Yours faithfully
C. S. Lewis
TO ARTHUR G REEVE S (W):
Magdalen College,
Oxford. 8/3/52
My dear Arthur
I hope to arrive at Crawfordsburn with W.46 on Aug. Wed. 20th. He will leave on Aug. Sat. 23rd. If agreeable I wd. like to stay on at the Hotel47 for a fortnight of your society, i.e. sail again on Mon. Sept 8th. Will that suit you? I can’t manage the Easter as well.
In the Last Chronide48 I think all the London parts (the ‘Bayswater Romance’) a bore and now always skip them. But I think the Crawley parts splendid.
I am wondering how your date with Tchainie went? Give her my love. Blessings.
Yours
Jack
TO SHELDON VANAUKEN (BOD): PC
Magdalen College
Oxford 15/3/52
Excellent. I’ll be (D.V.) in the Eastgate about 12 noon on Sat. March 22 d.
C.S.L.
TO GENIA GOELZ (L/P):
Magdalen College,
Oxford. 18 March 1952
Dear Genia
Don’t bother at all about that question of a person being ‘made a Christian’ by baptism. It is only the usual trouble about words being used in more than one sense. Thus we might say a man ‘became a soldier’ the moment that he joined the army. But his instructors might say six months later ‘I think we have made a soldier of him’. Both usages are quite definable, only one wants to know which is being used in a given sentence. The Bible itself gives us one short prayer which is suitable for all who are struggling with the beliefs and doctrines. It is: ‘Lord I believe, help Thou my unbelief.’49 Would something of this sort be any good?: Almighty God, who art the father of lights and who hast promised by thy dear Son that all who do thy will shall know thy doctrine:50 give me grace so to live that by daily obedience I daily increase in faith and in the understanding of thy Holy Word, through lesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
Yours
C. S. Lewis
TO VERA MATHEWS (W):
Magdalen etc.
22/3/52
Dear Miss Mathews
I was glad to get your letter. I seem to be as ignorant of America as you are of India. I had no idea your parsons preached Hell-fire: indeed I thought the ordinary presentation of Christianity with you was quite as milk-and-watery as with us, if not more so. We could do with a bit more Hell fire over here.
Clearly I misunderstood Cobham. I hadn’t thought of a wholly unregenerate man being levitated simply by someone else’s sanctity—tho’ of course we all hope this will happen to ourselves. Thanks for a picture of two charming creatures. I am glad to have one of them among my correspondents and wish Andy would write too: but I suppose that’s not much in his line. They sound as if they were animals with a sense of humour. Shall we see some more literary works by you? I hope you’ll go on. With very good wishes from us both.
Yours
C. S. Lewis
TO ROGER LANCELYN GREEN (BOD):
Magdalen College
Oxford 24/3/52
My dear Roger–
I have re-read The Luck51 and liked it very much. I felt, as I had felt at the first reading, that tho’ it could not have the quality you and I most prize in a story, yet it had a freshness, a real feel of wet wood & spring days wh. make it more than a mere treasure hunt. It is also extremely exciting. As luck wd. have it I met a lady who was looking for things to ‘read to the children’ & the Luck is now on her list. I think she’s a buyer too, not a library addict.
Now for Logistics. I see that the Beaumaris jaunt must be on my backward journey as, on the outward, it wd. be in the midst of the Aug. bank-holiday period.521 propose to sail from Belfast to L’pool53 on the night of Sept. Mon. 8th. Can we meet, say at Woodside ferry landing stage on the morning of