M.A. de la. Op. cit. P. 63; Erp S. van. Surety Agreements and the Principle of Accessority – Personal Security in the Light of a European Property Law Principle. P. 316; Вебер Х. Указ. соч. С. 94.
44
Хотя есть и намного более радикальное мнение проф. Buckland о том, что уступка основного долга, по идее, должна прекращать строго акцессорное обязательство (Buckland W. Principal and Fideiussor. Consumptio litis // Juridical Review. 1941. December. P. 2 (цит. по: Levy E. Principal and Surety in Classical Roman Law: Did action brought against the one consume the obligation of the other? // Seminar. Annual Extraordinaty Number of «The Jurist». 1944. Vol. II. P. 7).
45
Stöcker O.M., Sturner R. Op. cit. P. 49.
46
Steven A. Op. cit. P. 21.
47
Steven A. Op. cit. P. 30.
48
Так как это не ухудшает положение обязанного по обеспечительному договору лица.
49
Mata M.A. de la. Op. cit. P. 90.
50
См. аргументацию R. Anderson в: Steven A. Op. cit. P. 30.
51
Steven A. Op. cit. P. 28.
52
Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Scotland. P. 54.
53
Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. France. P. 65.
54
Вебер Х. Указ. соч. С. 303–304.
55
Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. The Netherlands. P. 41.
56
Real Property Law and Procedure in the European Union. Germany. P. 47.
57
Nasarre-Aznar S. Op. cit.; The Development of a European Capital Market. Report of a Group of experts appointed by EEC Commission (Segré Report). Brussels, 1966. P. 152–153; в особенности см.: Wolfsteiner H., Stöcker O. Non-accessory Security Right over Real Property for Central Europe // Notarius International. 2003. No. 1–2. P. 120.
58
Дедковский И.В. Указ. соч. С. 50–53.
59
Drobnig U. Principles of European Law. Study Group on a European Civil Code. Vol. 4. Personal Security. Munich, 2007. P. 208 (далее – PEL/Drobnig, Pers. Sec.).
60
The Suretyship in the Law of the Member States of the European Communities. P. 48.
61
PEL/Drobnig, Pers. Sec. P. 208.
62
Ibidem.
63
The Interaction of Contract Law and Tort and Property Law in Europe. A Comparative Study. P. 341; Steven A. Op. cit. P. 31–33; Mata M.A. de la. Op. cit. P. 133.
64
См. подробнее об этом: Егоров А.В. Ликвидационная стадия обязательства // Вестник ВАС РФ. 2011. № 9, 10.
65
PEL/Drobnig, Pers. Sec. P. 218–219.
66
Mata M.A. de la. Op. cit. P. 84.
67
PEL/Drobnig, Pers. Sec. P. 219–220.
68
Ibid. P. 220.
69
Ibid. P. 209.
70
Steven A. Op. cit. P. 34.
71
Вебер Х. Указ. соч. С. 309.
72
Stöcker O.M., Sturner R. Op. cit. 50.
73
Stöcker O.M., Sturner R. Op. cit. 50.
74
Кратко, но емко это выразил профессор P. Sparkes: «Справедливость требует акцессорности» (Sparkes P. European Land Law. Hart Publishing, 2007. P. 399).
75
Stöcker O.M., Sturner R. Op. cit. P. 46.
76
PEL/Drobnig, Pers. Sec. P. 212, 214–215.
77
Ibid. P. 215.
78
Erp S. van. Surety Agreements and the Principle of Accessority – Personal Security in the Light of a European Property Law Principle. P. 313.
79
Wieling H.J. Sachenrecht: Ein Handbuch. Bd. 1: Sachen, Besitz und Rechte an Beweglichen Sachen. 3. Aufl. Berlin: Springer, 2007. S. 27.
80
Erp S. van. Surety Agreements and the Principle of Accessority – Personal Security in the Light of a European Property Law Principle. P. 314.
81
Ср.: Erp S. van. Surety Agreements and the Principle of Accessority – Personal Security in the Light of a European Property Law Principle. P. 317.
82
The Integration of the EU Mortgage Credit Markets: Report by Forum Group on Mortgage Credit. P. 29.
83
The