information privacy leverage and how?
<--- Score
58. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
59. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Health care information privacy? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
60. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
61. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
62. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Health care information privacy changes?
<--- Score
63. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Health care information privacy results are met?
<--- Score
64. How did the Health care information privacy manager receive input to the development of a Health care information privacy improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
65. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
66. What are the Health care information privacy use cases?
<--- Score
67. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
68. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
69. How would you define Health care information privacy leadership?
<--- Score
70. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
71. Is there a critical path to deliver Health care information privacy results?
<--- Score
72. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
73. Has a Health care information privacy requirement not been met?
<--- Score
74. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
75. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
76. Is the scope of Health care information privacy defined?
<--- Score
77. Will team members regularly document their Health care information privacy work?
<--- Score
78. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
79. How do you think the partners involved in Health care information privacy would have defined success?
<--- Score
80. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
81. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
82. What was the context?
<--- Score
83. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health care information privacy work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
84. What is the scope?
<--- Score
85. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
86. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
87. Do you have a Health care information privacy success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
88. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
89. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
90. How do you manage unclear Health care information privacy requirements?
<--- Score
91. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
92. What system do you use for gathering Health care information privacy information?
<--- Score
93. How have you defined all Health care information privacy requirements first?
<--- Score
94. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
95. Are the Health care information privacy requirements complete?
<--- Score
96. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
97. Are accountability and ownership for Health care information privacy clearly defined?
<--- Score
98. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
99. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
100. Is Health care information privacy required?
<--- Score
101. How will the Health care information privacy team and the group measure complete success of Health care information privacy?
<--- Score
102. Have all basic functions of Health care information privacy been defined?
<--- Score
103. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
104. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
105. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
106. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
107. What is the context?
<--- Score
108. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
109. What happens if Health care information privacy’s scope changes?
<--- Score
110. How are consistent Health care information privacy definitions important?
<--- Score
111. Are approval