Score
72. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Data philanthropy leverage and how?
<--- Score
73. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
74. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
75. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Data philanthropy work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
77. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
78. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
79. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
80. What is in scope?
<--- Score
81. How did the Data philanthropy manager receive input to the development of a Data philanthropy improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
82. How do you manage unclear Data philanthropy requirements?
<--- Score
83. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
84. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
85. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
86. How would you define Data philanthropy leadership?
<--- Score
87. What system do you use for gathering Data philanthropy information?
<--- Score
88. What sources do you use to gather information for a Data philanthropy study?
<--- Score
89. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
90. What is the scope of the Data philanthropy work?
<--- Score
91. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
92. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
93. Is there a clear Data philanthropy case definition?
<--- Score
94. Have all basic functions of Data philanthropy been defined?
<--- Score
95. What gets examined?
<--- Score
96. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
97. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
98. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
99. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
100. Are the Data philanthropy requirements complete?
<--- Score
101. What are the record-keeping requirements of Data philanthropy activities?
<--- Score
102. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Data philanthropy? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
103. How do you hand over Data philanthropy context?
<--- Score
104. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
105. What are the Data philanthropy tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
106. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
107. Who is gathering Data philanthropy information?
<--- Score
108. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
109. Is the Data philanthropy scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
110. What are the core elements of the Data philanthropy business case?
<--- Score
111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
112. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
113. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
114. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
115. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
116. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Data philanthropy goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
117. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
118. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
119. How will the Data philanthropy team and the group measure complete success of Data philanthropy?
<--- Score
120. What are (control) requirements for Data philanthropy Information?
<--- Score
121. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
122. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
123. Is Data philanthropy linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
124. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
125. How do you think the partners involved in Data philanthropy would have defined success?
<--- Score
126. How are consistent Data philanthropy definitions important?
<--- Score
127. What would be the goal or target for a Data philanthropy’s