the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
69. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Google applications? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
70. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
71. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
73. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Google applications leverage and how?
<--- Score
74. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
75. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
76. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
78. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
79. Is Google applications linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
80. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
81. Have all basic functions of Google applications been defined?
<--- Score
82. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
83. Will a Google applications production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
84. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
85. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Google applications brings?
<--- Score
86. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
87. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
88. How have you defined all Google applications requirements first?
<--- Score
89. Is the scope of Google applications defined?
<--- Score
90. Who is gathering Google applications information?
<--- Score
91. What are the core elements of the Google applications business case?
<--- Score
92. What is the scope?
<--- Score
93. What system do you use for gathering Google applications information?
<--- Score
94. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
95. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
96. How will the Google applications team and the group measure complete success of Google applications?
<--- Score
97. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
98. What Google applications services do you require?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. Is there a critical path to deliver Google applications results?
<--- Score
101. Are the Google applications requirements complete?
<--- Score
102. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
103. How did the Google applications manager receive input to the development of a Google applications improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
104. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
105. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
106. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
107. Has the Google applications work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
108. What is the scope of the Google applications work?
<--- Score
109. What would be the goal or target for a Google applications’s improvement team?
<--- Score
110. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
111. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
112. Is there any additional Google applications definition of success?
<--- Score
113. What is the definition of Google applications excellence?
<--- Score
114. What sources do you use to gather information for a Google applications study?
<--- Score
115. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
116. Is there a clear Google applications case definition?
<--- Score
117. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
118. What gets examined?
<--- Score
119. Do you have a Google applications success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
120. What are (control) requirements for Google applications Information?
<--- Score
121. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
122. How do you manage unclear Google applications requirements?
<--- Score
123. How will variation in