ingrowth and many patients will go on to receive adjuvant radiation.
c. Caution should be used as intraoperative cardiopulmonary events have been reported with this technique.
d. Low-viscosity cement, forgoing canal pressurization, and the use of cement restrictor as well as high fractions of inspired oxygen and/or a distal vent hole (i.e., 2.5-mm drill bit) can be various strategies employed to lower this risk.
2. The peritrochanteric area of the femur has received the most attention, given the mechanical stress and construct failure observed with both extramedullary and intramedullary devices.
a. Extramedullary devices (plates) are associated with higher failure rates.
b. A statically locked long cephalomedullary device allows immediate weight-bearing through its load sharing properties.
3. A high number of pathologic fractures will never obtain osseous union and therefore several technical considerations are important to consider as the mechanical properties and elastic modulus of the implants vary between traumatic and pathologic etiologies.
a. Proximal nail diameter varies by manufacturer and using a larger-diameter (both proximally and distally) implant increases the bending rigidity of a cannulated implant by the radius to the third power.
b. As a general principle, statically locked (often with more than one distal interlocking screw) antegrade intramedullary nails are recommended for diaphyseal lesions.
c. Retrograde femoral nails should be avoided as they do not protect the femoral neck and risk intra-articular contamination and progression of disease.
d. Implants with a lower radius of curvature (more bowed) can facilitate more distal fixation when performing antegrade fixation for quite distal fractures (i.e., extreme nailing).
e. A dynamic interlocking hole can be used for “kissing screws” with both medial and lateral directed interlocking screws.
f. Hybrid fixation with plate/nail can provide accurate and reliable spanning fixation and allow for immediate weight-bearing.
g. The use of blocking screws to increase construct stability (▶Fig. 11.6).
Fig. 11.6 A statically locked long antegrade intramedullary femoral nail with low radius of curvature allowing more distal placement for this metaphyseal metastatic lung carcinoma pathologic fracture. Note “kissing screws” through dynamic interlocking hole, blocking screw and plate augmentation to allow immediate weight-bearing and increase construct rigidity with relatively short working length.
4. Arthroplasty removes many of the limitations of internal fixation by replacing the diseased and fractured bone, but benefits must be balanced with risk.
5. Wound healing, infection, and instability remain challenges in the often nutritionally and immunocompromised hosts.
6. Disease stage, performance status, patient goals, and the plan for adjuvant treatments (timing of chemotherapy) need to be carefully considered when deciding between arthroplasty and internal fixation.
D. Tibia
1. Pathologic fractures of the tibia are less frequently encountered, but can provide unique management challenges.
2. En block resection/proximal tibia replacement presents functional challenges with extensor mechanism reconstruction and therefore the use of surgical adjuvants in addition to robust fixation and poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) can often provide durable fixation while providing patients an early functional return with limited restrictions (▶Fig. 11.7).
3. Intramedullary nail tenets as outlined for the femur have similar application to impending or completed pathologic fractures of the tibia.
a. Large-diameter nails.
b. Numerus interlocking screws in multiple planes of fixation.
c. Adjuvant blocking screws to increase short working length stability (▶Fig. 11.6).
d. Extra-articular insertion technique.
e. Meticulous respect for soft tissues.
Fig. 11.7 Postoperative anteroposterior radiograph of a proximal tibia metastatic renal cell fracture treated with adjuvants including embolization, open curettage, argon beam thermal coagulation, cementation and internal fixation to allow minimal postoperative restrictions and initiate systemic chemotherapy in a timely fashion while preserving the extensor mechanism of the knee.
VI. Adjuvants
A. Surgical adjuvants are largely what separate the treatment of pathologic fractures from traumatic fractures. They are used strategically and intentionally to not only decrease tumor burden and chance for local disease progression or recurrence, but allow for safe and effective management while providing lasting and durable results.
B. Surgical adjuvants can be mechanical, chemical, or thermal in nature (▶Table 11.3
Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.
Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».
Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.
Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.