Françoise Noël

Nipissing


Скачать книгу

1.1.tif

      This image of the La Dalle portage on the French River demonstrates how the canoes were towed from the shore with a line. It clearly shows the river flowing through a fault line with sharp cliffs on one side and slightly less so on the other. This watercolour by John Elliott Woolford was prepared based on sketches he made while making the journey through the Nipissing Passageway with Lord Dalhousie in 1821.

       Courtesy of the Toronto Public Library, TPL 902-1-5.

1.2.tif

      Unlike many of the other watercolours produced from this trip, Woolford’s image of the source of the Mattawa River has a picturesque quality to it and in this image, the landscape is empty, much like those of the landscape artists of the early twentieth century. The Mattawa was often referred to as the Petite Rivière, or “Little River,” to distinguish it from the Ottawa, which was the Grande Rivière.

       Courtesy of the Toronto Public Library, TPL 902-1-6.

1.3.tif

      The beauty of the landscape near Mattawa, where tall hills rise up over the wooded shoreline of the Ottawa and the Mattawa Rivers, has been recorded in countless travel accounts. Here, John Elliott Woolford captures the beauty of the river at sunset, with the hillsides muted, almost like clouds, and a small island in the foreground.

       John Elliott Woolford, Petite Riviere Joins Ottawa near Lake Nippissing, 1821. Watercolour over graphite on wove paper, mounted on cardboard, 14.3x 23.7cm. Purchased 1979 with the assistance of a grant from the Government of Canada under the terms of the Cultural Property Export and Import Act. National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa. Photo © National Gallery of Canada.

      Even before Logan’s report was published, his data had been passed along to Joseph Bouchette, who was working on a new map of the Canadas. The ink on Bouchette’s map was hardly dry before it was used to make the case for roads that would reduce the cost of bringing pork to the timber areas of the Ottawa River watershed. At the time, supplies were transported from the western United States, down the Great Lakes to Kingston, then up the Ottawa River. Bouchette’s map showed that roads through the Ottawa-Huron tract would link the timber production areas of the Ottawa Valley with the back of the settlements on Lake Ontario that could supply produce. The red pine areas of the Upper Ottawa and the hardwood area that extended to the Amable du Fond River would be well served by a main road extending from Pembroke to the mouth of the French River.[5]

Page18.tif

      In this detail from Logan’s map to accompany his 1845 survey, both the route he followed through Lake Talon and the old canoe route through a river to the northwest of the lake can be seen.

       Courtesy of Library and Archives Canada, H1/410/Mattawa/1846 (2 sections), NMC n0014270k_a1.

      Despite all this activity, this land was still Anishinaabe territory. As the timber industry moved up the Ottawa Valley and agricultural land in southern Ontario (Canada West) filled, the colonial government decided to clear the way for settlement and resource development by signing a treaty with the First Nations people of this area. The Robinson-Huron Treaty of 1850 opened the way for such development, although the aboriginal population was, according to this treaty, free to continue to hunt and fish on crown land so long as it remained crown land.[6] Three reserves were created in the Lake Nipissing area by the Robinson-Huron Treaty and surveyed in 1853, although it is possible that the survey information for No. 9 and No. 13 was not in general use until after 1889.[7] The location of Reserve No. 10, set aside for Shabokeshick and his band, however, appeared on Colton’s map of 1869.

Page19.tif

      This detail from Bouchette’s 1846 map shows the Nipissing Passageway from Mattawa to Lake Nipissing. Details from the Logan survey, which were incorporated into this map, include elevations above sea level and the drop at each fall. On this map he still uses the name “Grand River” for the Ottawa, but the Mattawa is given as the “Mattawan.” Talon Falls are also indicated as “Hang Falls,” but there are no other translations. Unlike Logan, he does not refer to Upper and Lower Trout Lake, but to “L. la Tortue” and “L. Talon,” which creates confusion with the other Lake Talon. He also refers to the Mattawan Falls rather than the Paresseux Falls at that portage.

       Courtesy of David Rumsey Map Collection, www.davidrumsey.com .

1.6.tif

      This detail from Colton’s 1869 map of the Province of Ontario shows the progress of land surveys in the Ottawa-Huron tract. Closer to Lake Nipissing, only a few townships had been surveyed, and in the area south of Lake Nipissing there were still significant gaps in the topographical delineation of the rivers. The whole Pickerel River network still had not been added, although Lake Restoule was shown. Indian Reserve No. 10 was shown on this map, but not the other reserves in the area. A prime meridian has been surveyed to the north of Georgian Bay, providing a starting point for the surveys to the west of this. The survey of the Wanapitei River are incorporated and the outlines of the West Bay and West Arm of Lake Nipissing are better delineated than they had been by Bouchette in 1846.

       Courtesy of David Rumsey Map Collection, www.davidrumsey.com.

      Surveyors were sent into the field to evaluate the resources of the area. Provincial Surveyor Salter and Murray of the Geological Survey of Canada both conducted surveys in the area west and north of Lake Nipissing in the 1850s.[8] Both noted the “rocky and barren” nature of the land in much of this area. Only to the north of the French River did Salter find some “very fine land” — an area suitable for agriculture sufficient enough for sixty townships. At the time of these surveys, the aboriginal inhabitants collected the cranberries that grew in the great marshes along the banks of Lake Nipissing and along the Sturgeon River and shipped them out by the barrel from Lake Huron. The greatest difficulty faced by the harvesters was the small amount that could be taken down the French in one load by canoe. White fish was an important resource to them as well. They also constructed birch bark canoes and collected limestone for mortar and building on the Manitou islands and made maple sugar there and on Iron Island. They had several “habitations” on the lake, including one at Dokis Point. Murray noted specifically that their “little huts are tidy and orderly, and have an air of comfort about them.” There was some cultivation at the First Nations settlements, but the very high level of water every spring, according to the occupant of the Hudson’s Bay post on the Sturgeon River, made it difficult to grow things in these areas.

      South of Lake Nipissing in the area that extended from Georgian Bay to the Ottawa River, generally known as the Ottawa-Huron Tract, surveyors found only a few tracts of land suitable for agriculture; much of it was of value only for its timber. The area was divided into three natural zones: White Pine Country, Red Pine Country, and Hardwood Country. In the Nipissing area, agricultural land was found to the west of Mattawa and in the interior along South River. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the timber trade became the chief activity throughout the area, with logs descending either to Georgian Bay or down the Ottawa River.[9] The Ottawa timber baron, J.R. Booth, held extensive timber berths in the Lake Nipissing area. Rather than extend his operation into Georgian Bay, he had a short rail link constructed that transported logs from Callander across the height of land to Lake Nosbonsing and into the Ottawa River watershed.

      In the 1850s, serious consideration was given to improving the water route from Georgian Bay to Ottawa. Surveys were conducted and maps prepared, but nothing came of it at this time.[10] The Montreal, Ottawa, and Georgian Bay Canal Company began to lobby for a canal along this route again in 1896, but by then the size of the boats being used on the Great Lakes had changed, and extensive revisions to the earlier plans were required if such a structure were to be built. New estimates of costs were prepared for a twenty-two-foot canal and detailed new plans of the proposed route were produced