We must notice what they were doing when Jesus called them. They were doing their day’s work, catching the fish and mending the nets. It was so with many a prophet. ‘I am no prophet,’ said Amos, ‘nor a prophet’s son; but I am a herdsman, and a dresser of sycamore trees, and the Lord took me from following the flock, and the Lord said to me, “Go, prophesy to my people Israel”’ (Amos 7:14–15). The call of God can come to any one of us, not only in the house of God, not only in the secret place, but in the middle of the day’s work. As MacAndrew, Rudyard Kipling’s Scots engineer, had it:
From coupler flange to spindle guide
I see thy hand, O God;
Predestination in the stride
Of yon connecting rod.
Those who live in a world that is full of God cannot ever escape him.
(3) We must notice how he called them. Jesus’ summons was, ‘Follow me!’ It is not to be thought that on this day he stood before them for the first time. No doubt they had stood in the crowd and listened, no doubt they had stayed to talk long after the rest of the crowd had drifted away. No doubt they already had felt the magic of his presence and the magnetism of his eyes. Jesus did not say to them, ‘I have a theological system which I would like you to investigate; I have certain theories that I would like you to think over; I have an ethical system I would like to discuss with you.’ He said, ‘Follow me!’ It all began with a personal reaction to himself; it all began with that tug on the heart which begets the unshakable loyalty. This is not to say that there are none who think themselves into Christianity; but for most of us following Christ is like falling in love. It has been said that ‘we admire people for reasons, we love them without reasons’. The thing happens just because they are they and we are we. ‘And I,’ said Jesus, ‘when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself’ (John 12:32). In by far the greatest number of cases, people follow Jesus Christ not because of anything that Jesus said but because of everything that Jesus is.
(4) Lastly, we must notice what Jesus offered them. He offered them a task. He called them not to ease but to service. It has been said that what we all need is something in which to invest our lives. So Jesus called his disciples, not to a comfortable ease and not to a lethargic inactivity; he called them to a task in which they would have to spend themselves and burn themselves up, and, in the end, die for his sake and for the sake of others. He called them to a task wherein they could win something for themselves only by giving their all to him and to others.
JESUS BEGINS HIS CAMPAIGN
Mark 1:21–2
So they came into Capernaum; and immediately on the Sabbath day Jesus went into the synagogue and began to teach; and they were completely astonished at the way he taught, for he taught them like one who had personal authority, and not as the experts in the law did.
MARK’S story unfolds in a series of logical and natural steps. Jesus recognized in the emergence of John God’s call to action. He was baptized and received God’s seal of approval and God’s equipment for his task. He was tested by the devil and chose the method he would use and the way he would take. He chose his disciples that he might have a little circle of kindred spirits and that he might write his message upon them. And now he had to make a deliberate launching of his campaign. If a man had a message from God to give, the natural place to which he would turn would be the place where God’s people met together. That is precisely what Jesus did. He began his campaign in the synagogue.
There are certain basic differences between the synagogue and the church as we know it today.
(a) The synagogue was primarily a teaching institution. The synagogue service consisted of only three things – prayer, the reading of God’s word and the exposition of it. There was no music, no singing and no sacrifice. It may be said that the Temple was the place of worship and sacrifice; the synagogue was the place of teaching and instruction. The synagogue was by far the more influential, for there was only one Temple. But the law laid it down that wherever there were ten Jewish families there must be a synagogue, and, therefore, wherever there was a colony of Jews, there was a synagogue. If a man had a new message to preach, the synagogue was the obvious place in which to preach it.
(b) The synagogue provided an opportunity to deliver such a message. The synagogue had certain officials. There was the ruler of the synagogue. He was responsible for the administration of the affairs of the synagogue and for the arrangements for its services. There were the distributors of alms. A collection was taken daily in cash and in kind from those who could afford to give. It was then distributed to the poor; the very poorest were given food for fourteen meals per week. There was the Chazzan. He is the man whom the Authorized Version describes as the minister. He was responsible for the taking out and storing away of the sacred rolls on which Scripture was written; for the cleaning of the synagogue; for the blowing of the blasts on the silver trumpet which told people that the Sabbath had come; for the elementary education of the children of the community. One thing the synagogue did not have was a permanent preacher or teacher. When the people met at the synagogue service it was open to the ruler to call on any competent person to give the address and the exposition. There was no professional ministry whatsoever. That is why Jesus was able to open his campaign in the synagogues. The opposition had not yet stiffened into hostility. He was known to be a man with a message; and for that very reason the synagogue of every community provided him with a pulpit from which to instruct and to appeal to the people.
When Jesus did teach in the synagogue, the whole method and atmosphere of his teaching was like a new revelation. He did not teach like the scribes, the experts in the law. Who were these scribes?
To the Jews, the most sacred thing in the world was the Torah, the law. The core of the law is the Ten Commandments, but the law was taken to mean the first five books of the Old Testament, the Pentateuch, as they are called. To the Jews, this law was completely divine. It had, so they believed, been given directly by God to Moses. It was absolutely holy and absolutely binding. They said, ‘He who says that the Torah is not from God has no part in the future world.’ ‘He who says that Moses wrote even one verse of his own knowledge is a denier and despiser of the word of God.’
If the Torah is so divine, two things emerge. First, it must be the supreme rule of faith and life; and second, it must contain everything necessary to guide and to direct life. If that is so, the Torah demands two things. First, it must obviously be given the most careful and meticulous study. Second, the Torah is expressed in great, wide principles; but, if it contains direction and guidance for all life, what is in it implicitly must be brought out. The great laws must become rules and regulations – so their argument ran.
To give this study and to supply this development, a class of scholars arose. These were the scribes, the experts in the law. The title of the greatest of them was Rabbi. The scribes had three duties.
(1) They set themselves, out of the great moral principles of the Torah, to extract rules and regulations for every possible situation in life. Obviously this was a task that was endless. Jewish religion began with the great moral laws; it ended with an infinity of rules and regulations. It began as religion; it ended as legalism.
(2) It was the task of the scribes to transmit and to teach this law and its developments. These deduced and extracted rules and regulations were never written down; they are known as the oral law. Although never written down, they were considered to be even more binding than the written law. From generation to generation of scribes, they were taught and committed to memory. A good student had a memory which was like ‘a well lined with lime which loses not one drop’.
(3) The scribes had the duty of giving judgment in individual cases; and, in the nature of things, practically every individual case must have produced a new law.
In what ways did Jesus’ teaching differ so much from the teaching of the scribes? He taught with personal authority. No scribe ever gave a decision on his own. He would always begin, ‘There is a teaching that . . .’ and