the primary source, using evidence from the texts to support your statements.
What type of text is this: primary or secondary?
What are the subject and the source of information of the text?
What does the text say or suggest about this subject?
Who is the author or speaker of the text?
How specific, detailed, and accurate is my textual evidence?
11–12 History/Social Studies
Gist: Literal comprehension supported with evidence. Report in precise detail what the primary source and secondary sources say about their subject (or the texts the secondary sources may discuss), using evidence from these texts to support your assertions. Include in your retelling of the text any insights about the text and how these contribute to your understanding of these texts when considered together.
What type of text is this: primary or secondary?
What are the subject and the source of information of the text?
What does the text say or suggest about this subject?
How specific, detailed, and accurate is my textual evidence?
How do my revelations about the text and its contents add to my understanding of the text itself?
9–10 Science/Technical Subjects
Gist: Literal comprehension supported with precise details from the text. Sum up what the text says in precise detail and language, using evidence from the text to support your statements. Look closely at the words used to describe or explain when analyzing the text.
What type of text is this?
What is the subject of this text?
What does the text say about this subject?
Which precise details/data are important to mention?
How precise, accurate, and detailed is my textual evidence?
11–12 Science/Technical Subjects
Gist: Literal comprehension backed up with precise details from the texts. Report in detail what the text says, indicating those areas where the author emphasizes the difference between key elements or causes inconsistencies by leaving out key information when describing what they did or discovered.
What is the subject of this text?
What does the text say about this subject?
Which precise details/data are important to mention?
How precise, accurate, and detailed is my textual evidence?
What key distinctions or inconsistencies should I report?
Common Core Reading Standard 1: What the Teacher Does
To teach students how to “read closely,” do the following:
Provide students access to the text—via tablet or photocopy—so they can annotate it as directed.
Model close reading for students by thinking aloud as you go through the text with them or displaying your annotations on a tablet via an LCD projector; show them how to examine a text by scrutinizing its words, sentence structures, or any other details needed to understand its explicit meaning.
Display the text via tablet or computer as you direct students’ attention—by highlighting, circling, or otherwise drawing their attention—to specific words, sentences, or paragraphs that are essential to the meaning of the text; as you do this, ask them to explain what a word means or how it is used in that sentence or how a specific sentence contributes to the meaning of the larger text.
Pose questions—about words, actions, details—that require students to look closely at the text for answers.
To get students to determine “what the text says explicitly,” do the following:
Ask students to “say what it says”—not what it means, since the emphasis here is on its literal meaning.
Offer students an example of what it means to read explicitly and support your inferences with evidence; then tell them what a passage explicitly says, asking them to find evidence inside the text to support their statement about its meaning.
Give students several pieces of evidence and ask them to determine what explicit idea in the text the evidence supports.
To develop students’ ability to “cite specific textual evidence,” do the following:
Offer them a set of samples of evidence of different degrees of specificity and quality to evaluate, requiring them to choose the one that is best and provide a rationale for their choice.
Show students how you would choose evidence from the text to support your inference; discuss with them the questions you would ask to arrive at that selection.
To “make logical inferences,” ask students to do the following:
Add what they learned (from the text about this subject) compared to what they already know (about that subject); then, have students confirm that their reasoning is sound by finding evidence for their inferences.
Think aloud (with your guidance) about the process and how they make such inferences, and then have students find and use evidence to support their inferences.
To identify “uncertainties,” “gaps,” or “inconsistencies,” students can try the following:
Read—or reread—key sections that focus on reasoning or evidence, and ask, “So what?” or any of the reporter’s questions (who, what, when, where, why, how) that seem appropriate to the text or topic, looking for those spots that cannot answer these basic questions logically or fully.
To help your English Language Learners, try this strategy:
Repeat the process used to make such inferences, verbally labeling each step as you demonstrate it; then ask them to demonstrate their ability to do it on their own or with your prompting. Post the steps (e.g., “Inferences = What You Know + What You Learned”) with an example on a poster or handout they can reference on their own as needed.
Notes
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Preparing to Teach: Connections to My State’s Standards
Common Core Reading Standard 1: Academic Vocabulary: