measure(s) does Functional Database Model leverage and how?
<--- Score
67. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
68. Is Functional Database Model currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
70. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
71. Is there a Functional Database Model management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
72. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
73. How are consistent Functional Database Model definitions important?
<--- Score
74. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
75. Is Functional Database Model required?
<--- Score
76. Has the Functional Database Model work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
77. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
78. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
79. What gets examined?
<--- Score
80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
81. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
82. What happens if Functional Database Model’s scope changes?
<--- Score
83. Is the Functional Database Model scope manageable?
<--- Score
84. Have all basic functions of Functional Database Model been defined?
<--- Score
85. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
86. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
87. How would you define Functional Database Model leadership?
<--- Score
88. Are accountability and ownership for Functional Database Model clearly defined?
<--- Score
89. What is the definition of Functional Database Model excellence?
<--- Score
90. Are the Functional Database Model requirements testable?
<--- Score
91. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Functional Database Model goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
92. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
93. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Functional Database Model results are met?
<--- Score
94. Is there any additional Functional Database Model definition of success?
<--- Score
95. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
96. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
97. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
98. Do you have a Functional Database Model success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
99. Will a Functional Database Model production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
100. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
101. How did the Functional Database Model manager receive input to the development of a Functional Database Model improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
102. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
103. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
104. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
105. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
106. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
107. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
108. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
109. Is Functional Database Model linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
110. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
111. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
112. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
113. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
114. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
115. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
116. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
118. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
119. How have you defined