including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
15. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
16. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
17. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage changes in Funds management requirements?
<--- Score
19. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Funds management work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
20. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
21. What are the core elements of the Funds management business case?
<--- Score
22. How does the Funds management manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
23. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
24. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
25. Is Funds management required?
<--- Score
26. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
27. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
28. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
29. Are the Funds management requirements complete?
<--- Score
30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
31. How can the value of Funds management be defined?
<--- Score
32. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
33. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
34. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
35. What Funds management requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
36. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
37. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
38. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
39. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
40. What was the context?
<--- Score
41. Is there any additional Funds management definition of success?
<--- Score
42. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
43. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
44. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
45. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
46. Has a Funds management requirement not been met?
<--- Score
47. How do you think the partners involved in Funds management would have defined success?
<--- Score
48. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
49. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
50. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
51. Is special Funds management user knowledge required?
<--- Score
52. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Funds management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
53. Is the Funds management scope manageable?
<--- Score
54. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
55. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
56. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
57. Will a Funds management production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
58. How do you manage unclear Funds management requirements?
<--- Score
59. What gets examined?
<--- Score
60. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
61. What are the Funds management tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
62. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
63. Is Funds management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
64. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
65. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
66. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
67. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Funds management changes?
<--- Score
68. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
69. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
70. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Funds management brings?
<--- Score
71. Are accountability and ownership for Funds management clearly defined?
<--- Score
72. Has the improvement