appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
9. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
10. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
11. Is there a clear Personal Access System case definition?
<--- Score
12. What is the scope?
<--- Score
13. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
14. What Personal Access System requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
15. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Personal Access System leverage and how?
<--- Score
16. What are (control) requirements for Personal Access System Information?
<--- Score
17. Is Personal Access System required?
<--- Score
18. Will a Personal Access System production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
19. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
20. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
21. What happens if Personal Access System’s scope changes?
<--- Score
22. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
23. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
24. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
25. What are the core elements of the Personal Access System business case?
<--- Score
26. Will team members perform Personal Access System work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
27. Is the Personal Access System scope manageable?
<--- Score
28. What gets examined?
<--- Score
29. Is special Personal Access System user knowledge required?
<--- Score
30. What was the context?
<--- Score
31. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
32. Who is gathering Personal Access System information?
<--- Score
33. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
34. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
35. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
36. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
37. Is Personal Access System currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
38. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
39. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
40. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Personal Access System work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
41. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
42. Is Personal Access System linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
43. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
44. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
45. Are the Personal Access System requirements testable?
<--- Score
46. Is there any additional Personal Access System definition of success?
<--- Score
47. Will team members regularly document their Personal Access System work?
<--- Score
48. How do you manage changes in Personal Access System requirements?
<--- Score
49. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
50. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
51. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
52. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Personal Access System goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
54. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Personal Access System? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
55. What are the Personal Access System tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
56. What sources do you use to gather information for a Personal Access System study?
<--- Score
57. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
58. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
59. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
60. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
61. What is in scope?
<--- Score
62. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
63. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
64. What would be the goal or target for a Personal Access System’s improvement team?
<--- Score
65. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders,