team?
<--- Score
83. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
84. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
85. Do you have a Risk assessments success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
87. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
90. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
91. What system do you use for gathering Risk assessments information?
<--- Score
92. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
93. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
94. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk assessments? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
95. Is there any additional Risk assessments definition of success?
<--- Score
96. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk assessments activities?
<--- Score
97. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
98. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
101. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
102. What Risk assessments requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
103. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
104. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
105. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
106. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
107. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
108. What are the core elements of the Risk assessments business case?
<--- Score
109. Have all basic functions of Risk assessments been defined?
<--- Score
110. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
111. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
112. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
113. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
114. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?
<--- Score
115. How do you manage changes in Risk assessments requirements?
<--- Score
116. Is Risk assessments linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
117. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
118. What happens if Risk assessments’s scope changes?
<--- Score
119. What is the scope of Risk assessments?
<--- Score
120. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
121. How have you defined all Risk assessments requirements first?
<--- Score
122. Are users locked out for a defined time period after unsuccessful attempts?
<--- Score
123. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
124. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Risk assessments Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Are missed Risk assessments opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
2. What drives O&M cost?
<--- Score
3. How do you know that any Risk assessments analysis is complete and comprehensive?
<--- Score
4. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
5. How will the Risk assessments data be analyzed?
<--- Score
6. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
7. The approach of traditional Risk assessments works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?
<--- Score
8. What relevant entities could