63. What are the core elements of the IBM Cloud Object Storage business case?
<--- Score
64. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
65. What is the context?
<--- Score
66. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
67. How are consistent IBM Cloud Object Storage definitions important?
<--- Score
68. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
69. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
70. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
71. How do you manage changes in IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements?
<--- Score
72. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform IBM Cloud Object Storage work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
73. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
74. How do you catch IBM Cloud Object Storage definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
75. Have all basic functions of IBM Cloud Object Storage been defined?
<--- Score
76. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
77. Is the IBM Cloud Object Storage scope manageable?
<--- Score
78. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
79. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
80. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
81. Why are you doing IBM Cloud Object Storage and what is the scope?
<--- Score
82. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
83. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
84. What are (control) requirements for IBM Cloud Object Storage Information?
<--- Score
85. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
86. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
87. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
89. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
90. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
91. Do you have a IBM Cloud Object Storage success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
92. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
93. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
94. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
95. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
96. What would be the goal or target for a IBM Cloud Object Storage’s improvement team?
<--- Score
97. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of IBM Cloud Object Storage? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
99. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
100. What are the IBM Cloud Object Storage use cases?
<--- Score
101. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
102. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
103. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
104. How did the IBM Cloud Object Storage manager receive input to the development of a IBM Cloud Object Storage improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
105. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
106. Has the IBM Cloud Object Storage work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
107. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on IBM Cloud Object Storage?
<--- Score
108. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
109. How do you think the partners involved in IBM Cloud Object Storage would have defined success?
<--- Score
110. Are the IBM Cloud Object Storage requirements complete?
<--- Score
111. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
112. When is/was the IBM Cloud Object Storage start date?
<--- Score
113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
114. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
115. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does IBM Cloud Object Storage leverage and how?
<--- Score
116. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
117.